WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2016
19 Dec 2016The petitioners, a company importing and supplying ATMs to State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challengin...
Search Results for "relaxation power"
633 result(s) found
Found 633 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Removal of Employees Appointed on Compassionate Grounds Without Following Regular Recruitment Process. The Petitioners, Appointed as Hamals and Clerk-Typists Under a State Government Scheme for Dependents of Retiring Class IV Employees, Argued That Their Long Service of 18 Years Entitled Them to Absorption, While Respondents Contended That the Appointments Were Back-Door Entries in Violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
21 Apr 2017The judgment pertains to five writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 16th November 2015 by the...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Chief Translator and Interpreter, Upholds Overriding Rule 58 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Service Rules, 2000. Chief Justice's Power to Relax Qualifications Under Rule 58(b) Not Arbitrary, Absence of Eligible Candidate Found Suitable Justified Relaxation.
10 Sep 2018The writ petition challenged the promotion of respondent no.2 as Chief Translator and Interpreter. Petitioner Maroti, the sole Deputy Chief Translator...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Short Service Commissioned Officer Denied Third Chance for Permanent Commission Due to Policy Amendment — Directs Parity with Similarly Situated Officers Who Obtained Relief from Armed Forces Tribunal. The court held that the benefit of a judgment in favour of a citizen must be extended to all similarly situated persons without requiring them to approach the court, relying on Amrit Lal Berry vs. Collector of Central Excise and K.I. Shephard vs. Union of India.
13 Dec 2024The appellant, Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel, was commissioned as a Short Service Commissioned Officer in the Army Dental Corps on 10.03.2008 at the age of...
- 762
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-2016 Due to Non-Compliance with Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice issued under old regime after 01.04.2021 without following mandatory procedure under new provisions held invalid.
3 Mar 2026The petitioner, Varshaben Dhirajkumar Shah, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat High Court chal...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Lease for Delay in Hotel Construction Due to Economic Slowdown and Infrastructure Delays. Extension of Time Granted Without Additional Premium Under Agreement to Lease.
13 Mar 2025The petitioners, M/s. PVP Star Hotels Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...
- 697
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations Under Foreign Trade Policy — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by DGFT. The court quashed cancellation orders and directed fresh hearing, holding that quasi-judicial authorities must follow principles of natural justice before revoking licenses under the Foreign Trade Policy.
13 Jul 2018The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co. challengin...
- 38
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Regularisation Notifications for Contractual Employees in Haryana. The Court held that Notifications issued by the State of Haryana in 2014 for regularising contractual, ad hoc, and daily wage employees were invalid as they violated Supreme Court precedents and constitutional principles under Articles 14, 16, and 162 of the Constitution of India.
16 Apr 2026The dispute arose from the State of Haryana's issuance of Notifications in 2014 aimed at regularising the services of contractual, ad hoc, and daily w...
- 832
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 475
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Engineering College to Participate in CAP Admissions Despite AICTE’s Reduction of Intake Capacity. The Court Held That the College’s Non-Listing on AICTE Website Should Not Affect Admission Process, Subject to Final Outcome.
3 Aug 2015The Petitioner, Saraswati Education Society’s Saraswati College of Engineering, an institution established in 1997 and offering undergraduate engine...
- 21
