Search Results for "rectification order Section 154"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tax Determination Under Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Certificate of tax payable set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

The petitioner, The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the legality and validity of orders passed by Respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Bank in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Assessing Officer Had Already Considered Exemption Claim During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 30.03.2001 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Remands Tax Settlement Case to Settlement Commission for Fresh Determination on Waiver of Interest. High Court's Modification of Settlement Commission Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction.

The appeals arose from a dispute between Kakadia Builders Pvt. Ltd. and its promoter director (appellants/assessees) and the Income Tax Officer and Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.

The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...