Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tax Determination Under Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Certificate of tax payable set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the legality and validity of orders passed by Respondent No.2 determining the amount of tax payable pursuant to a declaration filed under the Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998 (KVSS), introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998. The petitioner specifically challenged the Certificate of tax payable issued by the Commissioner. The court examined the provisions of Section 90(2) of the Finance Act, which requires the designated authority to issue a certificate specifying the amount payable after verifying the declaration. The court found that the impugned certificate did not comply with the mandatory requirements of the section, as it lacked proper reasoning and did not reflect a proper determination. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition and set aside the certificate, directing the respondent to re-determine the tax payable in accordance with law. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court on 14th July 2023.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme - Certificate of Tax Payable - Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 - The petitioner challenged the certificate determining tax payable under KVSS. The court held that the certificate must strictly comply with the statutory requirements of Section 90(2), which mandates a speaking order with reasons. The impugned certificate was set aside for non-compliance. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Certificate of tax payable issued by the Commissioner under the Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998, is valid and in accordance with Section 90(2) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was allowed. The impugned Certificate of tax payable was set aside. The respondent was directed to re-determine the tax payable in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act
  • 1998
  • Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme
  • Tax determination
  • Certificate of tax payable
  • Mandatory statutory requirements
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (07) 128

Writ Petition No. 2537 of 1999

2023-07-14

K.R. Shriram, Firdosh P. Pooniwalla

2023:BHC-OS:6527-DB

Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner, Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents

The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

H.D. Trivedi, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 8; H.C. Parekh, Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, Bombay; Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the legality and validity of orders determining tax payable under the Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to quash the Certificate of tax payable issued by the Commissioner and sought re-determination of tax in accordance with law.

Filing Reason

The petitioner challenged the certificate on the ground that it did not comply with the statutory requirements of Section 90(2) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

Issues

Whether the Certificate of tax payable under KVSS was validly issued in compliance with Section 90(2) of the Finance Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the certificate was not in accordance with the statutory requirements. The respondents supported the certificate as valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The Certificate of tax payable under the Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme must strictly comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 90(2) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998, including proper reasoning and determination. Non-compliance renders the certificate invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Writ Petition challenges the legality and validity of the orders passed by Respondent no.2 determining the amount of tax payable by the Petitioner pursuant to a declaration filed under the Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998 (“KVSS”) introduced by Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 (“Finance Act”).

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 1999, reserved on 23rd June 2023, and pronounced on 14th July 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance (No.2) Act, 1998: Section 90(2)
  • Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Restricts Landlord's Access to Garden in Favor of Tenant's Long-Standing Use — Tenant's Prescriptive Right to Garden Adjoining Flat Protected Pending Suit. The court held that the defendant tenant's user of the garden for over 30 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Petition in Rent Control Case — Notice Demanding Higher Rent Than Agreed Rent Is Valid Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The Court held that a notice under Section 15 demanding a higher rent...