Search Results for "re-development agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "re-development agreement"

511 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 511 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Receiver Appointment Plea in Redevelopment Dispute — Oral Contract Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act. Court holds that an oral agreement for redevelopment of a co-operative housing society, even if evidenced by resolutions, is not specifically enforceable under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and that appointment of a receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not warranted when the plaintiff has no legal right to possession.

12 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Mangal Milan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking specific performance of an oral contract for redevelopment of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

23 Jun 2011

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Government Waiver of Cooperative Societies' NOC for MHADA Redevelopment. The impugned communication deleted the condition requiring consent of all 17 housing societies under Clause 7(b) of Regulation 33(5) of DCPR 2034 in the context of redevelopment of dilapidated buildings.

28 Jan 2026

Background: The case concerns the redevelopment of 17 residential buildings owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

4 May 2023

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance of Redevelopment Agreement with Cooperative Society. Court holds that a developer cannot enforce an MoU and Development Agreement against a cooperative society when the society's general body has not validly passed a resolution under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and the agreements are not binding on the society.

6 Nov 2012

The Plaintiffs, Mana Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition as Misuse of Process in Redevelopment Dispute with Non-Member Occupant. Court holds that a developer cannot seek interim relief against a non-signatory occupant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the occupant has independent rights and is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

30 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Gulshan Townplanners LLP, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition in IOD Requiring Registered Agreement with Tenant for Redevelopment. Condition No.10 in IOD directing that registered agreement with existing tenant not be submitted before CC is set aside as arbitrary and contrary to DCR.

5 Jun 2018

The Petitioner, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired redevelopment rights over land admeasuring approximately 20149.40 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

26 Aug 2024

The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Government Resolution Paragraph 12 Does Not Require Consent of All Tenants for Redevelopment Scheme. The Court held that the requirement of consent under paragraph 12 of the Government Resolution dated 3rd December, 2001 is not a condition precedent for the grant of permission for redevelopment and that the authorities must consider the application on merits.

18 Jul 2014

The petitioners, tenants of a building known as Bori Chawl situated at Ram Tekdi Road, Sewri, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)