Search Results for "notional promotion"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs State to Consider Promotion of Retired Employee After Exoneration in Disciplinary Enquiries. The Court held that since no disciplinary enquiry is pending and the petitioner has been exonerated, the State must consider his promotion as per DPC decisions of 1996.

The petitioner, F H Shaikh, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State of Gujar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Government Employee's Writ Petition Seeking Arrears of Pay for Notional Promotion. Court Holds that Under Rule 27(17) of Fundamental Rules, an Employee Not Entitled to Monetary Benefits for Post Not Actually Worked Despite Retrospective Promotion Following Acquittal.

The petitioner, S. Velammal, was appointed as a Typist in the Co-operative Audit Department in 1981 and rose to the post of Senior Inspector of Co-ope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Retired Employee Seeking Salary Arrears for Retrospective Promotion; Applies 'No Work, No Pay' Principle. Court Holds That Notional Pay Fixation Under Fundamental Rules Does Not Entitle Employee to Actual Salary for Period Not Worked.

The dispute arose from the denial of salary arrears to a retired employee of the Co-operative Audit Department after she was granted retrospective pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Probation Period — Confirmation Dates Back to Initial Appointment. Movement from Semi-Skilled to Skilled Grade is Confirmation/Upgradation, Not Promotion, and Seniority Must Be Fixed from Date of Initial Appointment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by V. Vincent Velankanni against the Union of India and others, setting aside the judgment of the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise Challenging CAT Order Quashing Reversion of Adhoc Promotee. Reversion of an employee promoted on adhoc basis upon revocation of suspension is illegal; employee entitled to reinstatement in promotional post.

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Central Excise filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mum...