Search Results for "dissenting minority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "dissenting minority"

132 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Repeal of University Act — State's Power to Repeal Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14. Heritage Protection Justifies Singling Out Khalsa University for Repeal, Not Arbitrary.

4 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the constitutional validity of the Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017, passed by the Punjab Legis...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Reserves Verdict on Stay of Film ‘Black Friday’ Amid Pending Trial in 1993 Blasts Case. Accused Argues Docudrama Constitutes Contempt and Defamation, Violates Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21.

31 Mar 2005

The writ petition was filed by Mushtaq Moosa Tarani, accused No. 44 in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts trial (Bombay Blast Case No. 1 of 1993), under the ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Winding Up Petitions Under Sections 433 and 434 of Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Disputed Debts Require Trial and Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings. The court set aside the dismissal order and remanded for consideration of interim relief, directing the respondent to deposit the disputed amount or provide security.

7 Jan 2013

The appellants, Innovatherm GmbH and Electrification Charpente Levage SAS, filed winding up petitions under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal and Upholds Striking Down of State Government’s Power to Extend Section 144 Orders Beyond Two Months. Extension of Magisterial Orders by Executive Fiat Without Judicial Review Held Violative of Article 19(1)(b),(c),(d) and Not Saved by Reasonable Restrictions.

29 Oct 1969

The dispute involved a constitutional challenge to the second part of section 144(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, which permitted the Stat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Caste Claim of MLA. Caste Claim Invalidated Due to Lack of Contemporaneous Documentary Evidence and Adverse Vigilance Report Under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000.

23 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Sanjay Bhaskar Raimulkar, an elected Member of the Legislative Assembly from Mehkar Constituency in the 2014 elections, filed a writ p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Court holds that disputes regarding possession of flats by dissenting members are not arbitrable under the agreement and that the developer failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief.

10 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Aditya Developers, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a Court Rece...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

23 Oct 2019

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver to Take Possession of Tenements for Redevelopment Despite Non-Signatory Members' Objection. Non-cooperating members bound by society's development agreement; Court Receiver appointed to facilitate redevelopment of dilapidated building.

22 Dec 2016

The petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)