Search Results for "court fees valuation"

494 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 494 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Royalty for Court Receiver's Property in License Dispute. Court modifies Receiver's order fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month and enhances to Rs.1,50,000 per month based on valuation report and market rates.

The plaintiff filed a chamber summons seeking modification of the Court Receiver's order dated 24 August 2010 fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Court Fee on Market Value in Partition Suit. Valuation Must Be Decided on Plaint Allegations, Not Cross-Examination Admissions, Under Sections 35(1) and 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

The writ petition arose from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the plaintiff (petitioner) against his brother and the legal heirs ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court Order Directing Valuation Under Bombay Court Fees Act in Will Cancellation Suit. Suit for cancellation of Will is not a mere declaratory suit and requires valuation under Sections 6(iv)(d) and 6(iv)(ha) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1956.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit challenging the Will of Narinder Singh Chowdhary, who died on 21/01/2012. The plaintiffs sought a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Return of Plaint on Pecuniary Jurisdiction Grounds. The court held that the Trial Court must determine jurisdiction based on proper valuation and cannot merely accept the plaintiff's valuation without scrutiny.

The petitioners, defendants in a civil suit, challenged an order of the IV Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Belgaum, dated 19.09.2014, rejecting their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Appeal Memo for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree, not plaint valuation under Section 8 of Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1171 of 2006 seeking declaration that a gift deed dated 10/11/2005 executed by defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Suit Involving Agreement for Flat Purchase. Amendment Seeking Declaration of Invalidity of Subsequent Sale Contract Held Governed by Section 6(iv)(ha) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; City Civil Court Loses Pecuniary Jurisdiction.

The appeal arose from an order passed by the Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, returning the plaint to the appellant under Order 7 Rule 10 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...