Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Appeal Memo for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree, not plaint valuation under Section 8 of Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1171 of 2006 seeking declaration that a gift deed dated 10/11/2005 executed by defendant nos.2 and 3 in favor of defendant no.1 was illegal and void, and for partition and permanent injunction. The suit was valued at Rs.200/- for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction. The trial court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs then filed Civil Appeal No.758 of 2008 before the District Court, Pune. The respondents (defendants) filed applications (Exhibits 9 and 14) contending that the appeal was not maintainable before the District Court because the value of the subject matter in the decree exceeded Rs.1,00,000/-, the pecuniary limit of the District Court under Section 6 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869. The learned District Judge-12, Pune allowed those applications and directed the memo of appeal to be returned for presentation before the appropriate forum. The plaintiffs challenged this order by way of writ petition. The legal issue was whether the forum of appeal is determined by the valuation in the plaint or the valuation in the decree. The court analyzed Section 8 of the Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869. The court held that the value of the subject matter for the purpose of appeal is the value as determined by the trial court in the decree, not the original plaint valuation. Since the trial court had determined the value of the suit properties in the decree as exceeding Rs.1,00,000/-, the appeal lay to the High Court, not the District Court. The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of the District Judge.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Forum of Appeal - Valuation - The forum of appeal is determined by the value of the subject matter as determined by the trial court in the decree, not the valuation originally set out in the plaint. The court held that the valuation for the purpose of appeal is the value of the subject matter as determined by the trial court in the decree, and not the valuation as originally set out in the plaint. (Paras 1, 10-12)

B) Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Section 8 - Determination of Forum of Appeal - Section 8 of the Suits Valuation Act, 1887 provides that the value of the subject matter in the court of first instance shall be the value for the purpose of appeal. The court interpreted that the value determined by the trial court in the decree is the value for appeal purposes. (Paras 10-12)

C) Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Section 6 - Pecuniary Jurisdiction - Section 6 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 prescribes the pecuniary limits for appeals to the District Court. The court held that the appeal lies to the District Court if the value of the subject matter in the decree does not exceed the pecuniary limit of the District Court. (Paras 10-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the forum of appeal is to be determined on the basis of the value of the subject matter of the suit as determined by the trial court in the decree or on the basis of the valuation of the suit as originally set out in the plaint.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The order dated 13/10/2010 passed by the learned District Judge-12, Pune is upheld. The memo of appeal is to be returned for presentation before the appropriate forum.

Law Points

  • Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree
  • not plaint valuation
  • Section 8 of the Suits Valuation Act
  • 1887
  • Section 6 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act
  • 1869
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (06) 32

WRIT PETITION NO.654 OF 2011

2014-06-26

R. M. SAVANT, J.

Mr. Shriram S Kulkarni for the Petitioners, Mr. Pralhad D Paranjape for the Respondents Nos. 4 to 6, Mr. T D Deshmukh for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3, Mr. A A Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate, Amicus Curie

Sagar Dattatraya Sakhare and Smt. Swati Dattatraya Sakhare

Shri Sanjay Waman Sathe, Shri Pandurang Sakharam Sakhare, Sou. Anusaya Pandurang Sakhare, Gajanan Balu Sakhare, Shri Ravindra Balu Sakhare, Balu Pandurang Sakhare

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of District Judge returning memo of appeal for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to set aside the order dated 13/10/2010 passed by the learned District Judge-12, Pune allowing applications Exhibits 9 and 14 and directing return of memo of appeal.

Filing Reason

The District Judge held that the appeal was not maintainable before the District Court because the value of the subject matter in the decree exceeded Rs.1,00,000/-.

Previous Decisions

The trial court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed Civil Appeal No.758 of 2008 before the District Court. The District Judge allowed applications of the defendants and directed return of memo of appeal.

Issues

Whether the forum of appeal is determined by the valuation in the plaint or the valuation in the decree.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the valuation for appeal should be the same as the valuation in the plaint (Rs.200/-). Respondents argued that the valuation for appeal is the value of the subject matter as determined by the trial court in the decree, which exceeded Rs.1,00,000/-.

Ratio Decidendi

The forum of appeal is determined by the value of the subject matter as determined by the trial court in the decree, not the valuation originally set out in the plaint. Section 8 of the Suits Valuation Act, 1887 provides that the value of the subject matter in the court of first instance shall be the value for the purpose of appeal, and that value is the one determined by the trial court in the decree.

Judgment Excerpts

A short question which arises for consideration in the above Petition is, whether the forum of Appeal is to be determined on the basis of the value of the subject matter of the Suit as determined by the Trial Court in the decree or on the basis of the valuation of the suit as originally set out in the plaint. The value of the subject matter for the purpose of appeal is the value as determined by the trial court in the decree, not the original plaint valuation.

Procedural History

Plaintiffs filed Regular Civil Suit No.1171 of 2006. Trial court decreed the suit. Plaintiffs filed Civil Appeal No.758 of 2008 before District Court. Defendants filed applications Exhibits 9 and 14 challenging maintainability. District Judge allowed applications and directed return of memo of appeal. Plaintiffs filed Writ Petition No.654 of 2011 before High Court. High Court dismissed the writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Suits Valuation Act, 1887: Section 8
  • Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869: Section 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC. Death Penalty for Accused No. 1 and Life Imprisonment for Accused No. 2 Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Appeal Memo for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree, not plaint valuation under Section 8 of Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of Bomb...