KAHC030038572012_1
22 Dec 2020...
Search Results for "Rule 147 proviso"
608 result(s) found
Found 608 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition Challenging Reservation in Government Tenders for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Petitioner Asserts that Amendment to Section 6 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 and Insertion of Rule 27(A) Providing 17.15% and 6.95% Reservation for SC/ST in Works up to ₹50 Lakhs Violates Constitutional Rights.
20 Dec 2019The petitioner, a Class-I contractor enrolled with the Karnataka Public Works Department since 2008-09, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Gift of Shares Without Consideration — Gift Does Not Constitute Income Escape Under the Act.
8 Mar 2024The petitioner, M/s. Jai Trust, a trust incorporated under the Indian Trust Act, 1882, challenged the legality and validity of a notice dated 12 March...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
2 Feb 2024The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Petitioner Had Disclosed All Facts in Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).
13 Mar 2023The petitioner, Milton Plastics Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 22.03.2004 is...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose — Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure
24 Jan 2012The petitioner, DIL Ltd., challenged a notice dated 8 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the assessmen...
- 121
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Disposes of Criminal Petitions Seeking Quashing of Proceedings Under Mines and Minerals Act. The Petitions Challenged Registration of Cases Under IPC and MMRD Act, 1957, Claiming Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Section 22.
6 Feb 2019The High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench, presided by Justice H.P. Sandesh, heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the...
- 43
High Court
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.
7 Mar 2025The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...
- 1352
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09 Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts and Change of Opinion. Remuneration Paid to Directors Was Fully Disclosed and Examined During Original Assessment, So Reopening Invalid.
20 Feb 2013The petitioner, M/s. OHM Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a share and stock broker, challenged notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reope...
- 102
