KAHC030038572012_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI
  • 88
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC030038572012_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (12) 7

MFA NO.31781/2010 c/w MFA NOS.31782/2010, 30418/2011, 30649/2011, 31036/2011, 31128/2011, 31393/2011 & 32463/2012; MFA NO.31842/2012 c/w MFA NOS. 31844/2012 & 31881/2012; MFA NO.30659/2013 c/w MFA NOS.30656/2013, 30657/2013 & MFA NO.30658/2013; MFA NO.30904/2012; MFA NO.32191/2012; MFA NO.200224/2019; MFA NO.200225/2019; MFA NO.32243/2012 & MFA NO.31685/2012 (MV)

2020-12-22

HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Shivanand Patil, Harshavardhan R. Malipatil, S.S.Aspalli, B.R.Math, R.S.Siddapurkar, R.V.Nadagouda, Sanjeev Kumar C. Patil, G.B.Yadav, Sudarshan M., Ustad Sadat Hussain, Shivasharana Reddy, S.K. Kankatte, Babu H.Metagudda, Sanganabasava B. Patil, G.G.Chagashetty, Sanjay M.Joshi, Anuradha M. Desai, Basavaraj R. Math, Preeti Patil Melkundi, Kailash C.Jidage, and others

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Shamaraya S/o Basanna Kattimani and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Remedy Sought

Various appeals by insurance companies to set aside/reduce compensation and by claimants seeking enhancement of compensation

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the compensation awarded by the MACTs

Previous Decisions

Various awards passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Procedural History

Multiple appeals were filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench against awards passed by various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. The appeals were clubbed and heard together. The judgment was delivered on 22.12.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Judgment Debtor's Petition to Set Aside Auction Sale Due to Non-Compliance with Order 21 Rules 84 and 85 CPC. The court held that the auction purchaser's failure to deposit the remaining 75% of the bid amount within 15 ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Election Petition Appeal, Remands for Trial. The High Court's dismissal of the election petition was found to be unjustified as it contained sufficient material facts.