HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

KAHC030038572012_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI

Admin

2026-08-20 15:31:26

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

KAHC030038572012_1

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (12) 7

MFA NO.31781/2010 c/w MFA NOS.31782/2010, 30418/2011, 30649/2011, 31036/2011, 31128/2011, 31393/2011 & 32463/2012; MFA NO.31842/2012 c/w MFA NOS. 31844/2012 & 31881/2012; MFA NO.30659/2013 c/w MFA NOS.30656/2013, 30657/2013 & MFA NO.30658/2013; MFA NO.30904/2012; MFA NO.32191/2012; MFA NO.200224/2019; MFA NO.200225/2019; MFA NO.32243/2012 & MFA NO.31685/2012 (MV)

2020-12-22

HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Shivanand Patil, Harshavardhan R. Malipatil, S.S.Aspalli, B.R.Math, R.S.Siddapurkar, R.V.Nadagouda, Sanjeev Kumar C. Patil, G.B.Yadav, Sudarshan M., Ustad Sadat Hussain, Shivasharana Reddy, S.K. Kankatte, Babu H.Metagudda, Sanganabasava B. Patil, G.G.Chagashetty, Sanjay M.Joshi, Anuradha M. Desai, Basavaraj R. Math, Preeti Patil Melkundi, Kailash C.Jidage, and others

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Shamaraya S/o Basanna Kattimani and others

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Remedy Sought

Various appeals by insurance companies to set aside/reduce compensation and by claimants seeking enhancement of compensation

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the compensation awarded by the MACTs

Previous Decisions

Various awards passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Procedural History

Multiple appeals were filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench against awards passed by various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. The appeals were clubbed and heard together. The judgment was delivered on 22.12.2020.

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173(1)

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus, Directs Greater Chennai Corporation to Demolish Unauthorized School Lab Building. The Court held that once an unauthorized construction is sealed under Sections 56 and 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country P... 2026-09-21 18:30:15

High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Extortion in Property Dispute — Allegations Found to Be Civil in Nature. Court held that mere demand for money in a property transaction does not constitute extortion under Section 384 IPC when the dispute is essen... 2026-09-21 18:30:06

KAHC030038572012_1

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Previous Decisions

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Limitation Dispute — Suit Remitted for Fresh Consider...

Supreme Court Refers Jurisdiction Conflict in Trade Marks Act and Commercial Courts Act to...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Tender Eligibility Dispute — Clarifies Judicial Revie...

Supreme Court Rejects Application Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act Due to Limitat...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Income Tax Dispute — Jurisdiction under Section 263 U...