Search Results for "Right to Information"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Information Commission Order in RTI Case — Petitioner Not a Third Party Under Section 11 of RTI Act. Personal Information of Public Servant Sought Cannot Be Denied Under Section 8(1)(j) Without Showing Larger Public Interest.

The petitioner, Smt. S. Savithramma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Held Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. Disclosure of commercial tax returns of six firms denied as personal information not related to any public activity.

The petitioner, Adarsh S/o Gautam Pimpare, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes State Information Commission Order Revoking Earlier Direction to Supply Information Under RTI Act — Commission Cannot Review Its Own Orders in Complaint Proceedings Under Section 18(1)(e) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Dominic Gabriel Philip, sought information from St. John's High School, Nagpur (respondent no.2) under the Right to Information Act, 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Information Commissioner's Orders Recalling Predecessor's Decision While Writ Petition Pending. Information Commissioner Cannot Review or Recall Own Order When Challenge to That Order is Sub Judice Before High Court.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Namdeo Kakade, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 25.07.2013 and 15.10.2013 passed by the Chief Information...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Quashes Chief Information Commissioner's Orders Recalling Predecessor's Decision in RTI Matter — Pending Writ Petition Before High Court Bars Commissioner from Reviewing Own Order.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Namdeo Kakade, filed a writ petition under the Right to Information Act, 2005, challenging two orders dated 25.07.2013 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Information Commission Order Directing Disclosure of Notices Issued to Judges Under RTI Act — Notices Held to Be 'Personal Information' Exempt Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005

The High Court of Karnataka allowed two writ petitions filed by the State Public Information Officer and Deputy Registrar (Establishment) of the High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Petition of Public Information Officer in RTI Case — Station Diary Entries Exempt Under Section 8(1)(h) of Right to Information Act. Disclosure of investigation-related information that would impede investigation or prosecution is exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act.

The case involves a challenge by the Petitioner, Shekhar Prabhudessai, Superintendent of Police (South) and Public Information Officer, against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Appellate Authority Under RTI Act. First Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act, 2005 is not a 'Court' within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging breach of an order dated 29th May 2007 passed by the First Appellate Authority and Deputy Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RTI Disclosure of Contractual Information Between Private Companies and Government. Information Sought Relates to Public Activity and Falls Under Section 2(h) of RTI Act as 'Public Authority'.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s Shonkh Technology International Ltd. and M/s United Telecom Limited challenging orders of the St...