Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Director in Cooperative Society Fraud Case — No Membership or Consent Found. Applicant Kishor Pandurang Garad, arraigned as accused no.16 in Crime No.86/2011 under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, was not a member of the society and had never applied for directorship; court held that continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process of law.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Kishor Pandurang Garad, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of the first information report (FIR) in Crime No.86/2011 registered at City Police Station, Khamgaon, against 35 persons, including the applicant as accused no.16. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in connection with the affairs of Shri Gajanan Urban Credit Cooperative Society Limited, Khamgaon. The applicant was arraigned as a Director of the society. The applicant contended that he had never applied for membership of the society and, therefore, could not have been a Director. Upon learning of his implication, he filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) seeking details of the society. The Manager of the society, by a letter dated 2 July 2011, provided information that: (a) the society had 5896 members but the applicant's name was not in the membership list; (b) a person named Kishor Pandurang Garad was shown as a Director inducted by a resolution dated 7 July 2006, but no application or consent letter from him was available; (c) the applicant had no savings account, fixed deposit, or loan account with the society. The court observed that the RTI reply clearly established that the applicant had no connection with the society. The court held that continuing the prosecution against the applicant would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court allowed the application, quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings against the applicant, and made the rule absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - Applicant was arraigned as accused no.16 in Crime No.86/2011 for offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC based on his alleged role as Director of Shri Gajanan Urban Credit Cooperative Society Limited. The applicant contended that he was never a member of the society and had not applied for or consented to directorship. The Manager of the society, in response to an RTI application, confirmed that the applicant's name was not in the membership list, no application or consent letter was available, and he had no savings account, fixed deposit, or loan account with the society. The court held that continuing the prosecution against the applicant would be an abuse of the process of law and quashed the FIR and all proceedings against him. (Paras 3-7)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Inherent Powers - Section 482 CrPC - No Prima Facie Case - The court found that the material on record, including the RTI reply, clearly showed that the applicant had no connection with the society. There was no prima facie case against him, and the allegations in the FIR did not disclose any offence committed by him. The court emphasized that the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. (Paras 4-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings against the applicant, who was not a member of the society and had not consented to be a director, should be quashed under Section 482 of CrPC?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.86/2011 registered at City Police Station, Khamgaon, and all consequential proceedings against the applicant are quashed. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Abuse of process of law
  • No prima facie case
  • Lack of consent or membership
  • Cooperative society fraud
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (07) 148

Criminal Application (APL) No.436 of 2011

2012-07-13

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J

Mr. A.V. Bhide for Applicant, Mr. S.S. Doifode, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-State

Kishor Pandurang Garad

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR in Crime No.86/2011 and all consequential proceedings against the applicant

Filing Reason

Applicant was arraigned as accused no.16 in a fraud case related to a cooperative society, but he was never a member or director of the society and had not consented to directorship

Issues

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings against the applicant should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the applicant was not a member of the society and had not consented to be a director?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant submitted that he had never applied for membership of the society and therefore could not be a director; RTI reply confirmed his name was not in membership list and no application or consent letter existed. Respondent-State opposed the application, but the court found no prima facie case against the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the material on record clearly shows that the applicant had no connection with the alleged offence and continuing prosecution would be an abuse of the process of law, the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash the FIR and proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The Manager of the society by a letter dated 2.7.2011 gave the following information: (a) ... the name of the present applicant does not find place in the list of members of the society. (b) ... there is no application filed by Kishor Pandurang Garad. No consent letter of Kishor Pandurang Garad is available. In the present case, the applicant has been arraigned as an accused in the capacity of being the Director of the society. The information received under the RTI Act clearly shows that the applicant was not a member of the society and there is no application or consent letter available on record.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No.436 of 2011 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.86/2011. The court heard the matter, reserved judgment on 5 July 2012, and pronounced on 13 July 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B
  • Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act):
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Director in Cooperative Society Fraud Case — No Membership or Consent Found. Applicant Kishor Pandurang Garad, arraigned as accused no.16 in Crime No.86/2011 under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Dispute Over Partition and Possession of Family Property in Vishakhapatnam. Legal battle ensues over the inheritance and division of a residential property among the heirs of late Ghouse Khan, highlighting issues of succession under Mohammedan Law a...