Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling and Holdings) Act"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling Holdings) Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Error in Tribunal's Finding That He Was a Non-Surplus Holder.

The petitioner, Keshavrao s/o Vaijoba Deshmukh, a resident of Lohgaon, Taluka and District Parbhani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Notice Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Non-Prosecution. Petitioner Failed to Appear or Take Steps to Prosecute the Petition, Leading to Dismissal.

The petitioner, Qader Khan s/o Ismail Khan, a resident of Parbhani district, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 17 Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Madhavrao Laxmanrao Karhale, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Suo Motu Reopening Notice Under Ceiling Act for Being Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 3 Years Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Strictly Adhered To.

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sidram Ganpatrao Solunke, were original land holders in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act for Delay Beyond Limitation Period. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 15 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Shaikh Ahmed, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice in Ceiling Act Case. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 16 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Kondabai, as legal heir of deceased Gangubai Kadam, challenged a notice dated 23.06.1992 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Aurang...