Search Results for "Food Analyst"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case Due to Inordinate Delay Depriving Right to Reanalysis. Delay of 35 months in filing complaint violated Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, rendering trial futile.

The applicants, who were directors of M/s. Bunge Agri Business India Ltd., filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case Due to Non-Service of Public Analyst Report. Mandatory service requirement under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was not met as report was not served on accused, vitiating prosecution and conviction.

The dispute arose from a prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, where the appellant was convicted for selling adulterated ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Secretary in Food Safety Violation — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Role. Secretary Not Present at Sampling, Complaint Lacks Averment of Responsibility Under Section 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The applicant, Hemant Sukaji Funde, was the Secretary of Gurukrupa Adiwasi Prathmik and Madhyamik Ashramshala, Thana, Amgaon, Gondia. He was arraigned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order of the learned Additional Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Discrepancy Between Analyst Reports and Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Adulteration Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, appealed against the judgment and order dated 11/10/2000 passed by the 6th Judicial Magistrate F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 50 of PFA Rules Regarding Preservative Addition and Timely Dispatch of Sample to Public Analyst Leads to Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23.3.2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akola, District Ahmed...