Search Results for "Court fee valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Court fee valuation"

272 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 272 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition by Defendants in Suit for Declaration and Injunction, Quashing Trial Court Order to Decide Valuation and Court Fee as Preliminary Issue. Held that issues relating to valuation and court fee are mixed questions of law and fact and must be decided at final stage under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC.

17 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who were defendants No.5 and 6 in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondents (plaintiffs), challenged an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons Issued Without Jurisdiction — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio. The court quashed summons under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 issued by an officer in Coimbatore to a Nagpur-based company, holding that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction.

6 May 2026

The petitioner, M/s D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited, a Nagpur-based company, challenged summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Office...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Applicable. The court held that the DRT erred in rejecting the refund application without considering Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, which provides for refund when a case becomes infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Will dated 27-05-1985 held not binding on plaintiff as it was not proved to be the last will of the testator.

9 Dec 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 06-12-2013 passed by the XXVIII Additional City Civil Judge at Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Valuation Order in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Possession. Suit for declaration of exclusive ownership and possession of flat must be valued on market value under Section 6(iv)(d) of Bombay Court Fees Act, not under Section 6(4)(j) for specific performance.

9 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Kiran Suresh Bhagiya, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Case — Reduces Compensation by Applying Deduction for Development Charges. Court Enhances Multiplier for Irrigated Land from 8 to 10, Resulting in Modified Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

29 Aug 2017

The case pertains to an appeal by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Executive Engineer (acquiring body) against the judgment and order dated 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Order Directing Payment of Court Fee on Higher Valuation in Appeal. Court holds that valuation for court fee and jurisdiction are distinct, and appeal valuation is determined by the relief granted in the decree, not the market value of the property.

9 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Pramod Prakashchandra Banait, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28/07/2014 passed by the Appellate Court (District ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Taxing Master's Order on Court Fees in Property Suit — Court Fees Must Be Paid on Current Market Value Under Section 5 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959. Plaintiff's Challenge to Order Directing Payment of Court Fees on Current Market Value Dismissed as Consent Decree in Prior Suit Does Not Affect Court Fee Liability in Subsequent Suit.

24 Jul 2013

The plaintiff, Smt. Hema Valecha, filed a Chamber Summons challenging an order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by the learned Taxing Master of the Bombay Hi...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)