High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition by Defendants in Suit for Declaration and Injunction, Quashing Trial Court Order to Decide Valuation and Court Fee as Preliminary Issue. Held that issues relating to valuation and court fee are mixed questions of law and fact and must be decided at final stage under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were defendants No.5 and 6 in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondents (plaintiffs), challenged an order dated 13.06.2019 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar, in O.S. No.19/2017 (old No.30/2013). The impugned order allowed I.A.No.VI filed by the plaintiffs, directing that the issue regarding valuation and court fee be decided as a preliminary issue before other issues. The petitioners contended that the issue of valuation and court fee is a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The High Court, after hearing the petitioners and noting that the respondents had not contested the matter, examined the legality of the order. The court observed that Order XIV Rule 2 CPC permits the court to decide a preliminary issue only if it is a pure question of law. Since the issue of valuation and court fee involves factual aspects, it cannot be treated as a preliminary issue. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the trial court to decide the issue of valuation and court fee along with other issues at the time of final adjudication. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure Code - Preliminary Issue - Order XIV Rule 2 CPC - Valuation and Court Fee - The trial court's order directing that the issue of valuation and court fee be decided as a preliminary issue was set aside. The High Court held that issues relating to valuation and court fee are mixed questions of law and fact and cannot be decided as preliminary issues under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC. The court directed that the issue be decided along with other issues at the time of final adjudication. (Paras 3-5)

B) Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Section 11 - Valuation and Court Fee - The court held that the question of valuation and court fee is not a pure question of law but involves factual aspects, and therefore, it should be decided at the final stage along with other issues. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court was justified in directing that the issue regarding valuation and court fee be decided as a preliminary issue before other issues, or whether such issue should be decided along with other issues at the final stage.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order dated 13.06.2019 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar, on I.A.No.VI in O.S.No.19/2017, and directed the trial court to decide the issue regarding valuation and court fee along with other issues at the time of final adjudication.

Law Points

  • Order XIV Rule 2 CPC
  • preliminary issue
  • valuation and court fee
  • mixed question of law and fact
  • Section 11 of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act
  • 1958
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (06) 78

WP No. 111730 of 2019 (GM-CPC)

2026-06-17

Sachin Shankar Magadum

Sri. Laxman T. Mantagani (for petitioners)

Chairman, Shri Someshwar Farmers Co-operative Spinning Mill Ltd. and Chief Executive Officer/Managing Director, Shri Someshwar Farmers Co-operative Spinning Mill Ltd.

Basappa S/o. Sankappa Hadapad @ Navi and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the trial court in a civil suit.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (defendants No.5 and 6) sought a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 13.06.2019 on I.A.No.VI in O.S.No.19/2017 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar, directing that the issue regarding valuation and court fee be decided as a preliminary issue.

Filing Reason

The petitioners challenged the trial court's order directing that the issue of valuation and court fee be decided as a preliminary issue, contending that such issue is a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC.

Previous Decisions

The trial court allowed I.A.No.VI filed by the plaintiffs and directed that the issue regarding valuation and court fee be decided as a preliminary issue.

Issues

Whether the trial court was justified in directing that the issue regarding valuation and court fee be decided as a preliminary issue before other issues? Whether the issue of valuation and court fee is a pure question of law or a mixed question of law and fact?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the issue of valuation and court fee is a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC. The respondents did not contest the matter.

Ratio Decidendi

Issues relating to valuation and court fee are mixed questions of law and fact and cannot be decided as preliminary issues under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC. Such issues must be decided along with other issues at the final stage of the suit.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petition is filed by defendant Nos.5 and 6 questioning the order dated 13.06.2019 on I.A.No.VI in O.S.No.19/2017 (old No.30/2013) passed by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar, vide Annexure-F in so far as an order to decide the issue with regards valuation and court fee along with other issues at the time of final adjudication of the case and etc. The court held that the issue of valuation and court fee is a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC.

Procedural History

The respondents (plaintiffs) filed O.S.No.19/2017 (old No.30/2013) for declaration and injunction. The plaintiffs filed I.A.No.VI seeking a direction to decide the issue of valuation and court fee as a preliminary issue. The trial court allowed the application on 13.06.2019. The petitioners (defendants No.5 and 6) challenged this order by filing the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The High Court stayed the suit proceedings. The respondents did not engage counsel before the High Court. The High Court allowed the writ petition on 17.06.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Order XIV Rule 2
  • Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows SFC Petition for Enforcement of Guarantee Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act, 1951. Guarantor's Liability Held Co-extensive with Principal Debtor Despite Non-Enforcement Against Principal Debtor.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal for Lack of Permission Under Section 170 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Insurer Cannot Challenge Award on Merits Without Tribunal's Satisfaction of Collusion or Non-Contest by Owner.