Search Results for "arbitrary evaluation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "arbitrary evaluation"

708 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 708 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of SSD Fund Employees for Pensionary Benefits Under 6th CPC — Holds That Long-Term Employment with Government Control and Parity with Regular Employees Confers Status of Government Servants. The Court found that denial of benefits to SSD Fund staff while granting them to other SFF personnel performing similar duties violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

21 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by six employees (Rajkaran Singh, Jagat Ram Joshi, Vishu Dutt Tripathi, HK Naithani, Shiv Kumar, and Surat ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Press Release on GST Classification of Hand Sanitisers as Disinfectants — Executive Cannot Pre-empt Quasi-Judicial Adjudication. Press Release dated 15.07.2020 directing classification of alcohol-based hand sanitisers as 'disinfectants' under GST held ultra vires and manifestly arbitrary for encroaching upon quasi-judicial functions.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s Schulke India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in trading of hand rubs/sanitisers and antiseptics, which it claims are used as pharmaceutical...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Bid in Tender for ACP Sheets — No Arbitrariness Found in MSRTC's Decision to Reject L-2 Bidder's Price Match Offer After L-1 Withdrawal.

14 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Unistone Panels Pvt. Ltd., and its director Lalit Mittal, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Conditions for Dialysis Centres — No Malafides or Arbitrariness Found in Eligibility Criteria. The court held that tender conditions are within the government's domain and not subject to judicial interference unless arbitrary or discriminatory.

5 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Dr. R. Venkatesh challenging tender notifications issued by the State of Goa for establishing dia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows CBSE Class 10 Student to Appear for Compartment Exam Despite Missing Regular Exam Due to Medical Reasons. Clause 41.2 of CBSE Bye-laws restricting eligibility for compartment exam to only those who appeared in regular exam is struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

21 Sep 2020

The petitioner, a 16-year-old girl student of Class 10, challenged Clause 41.2 of the CBSE Examination Bye-laws and a Circular dated 12.08.2020 which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment as Lower Division Clerk - Mandamus Issued for Fulfilling Eligibility Conditions. Petitioner's Candidature Wrongly Rejected for Lack of Experience Despite Possessing Required Qualifications and Experience Certificate.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Miss. Dilsha Datta Mashelkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking a mandamus directing the Mapusa Munici...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petitions Challenging AICTE's Retrospective Reduction of Engineering Seats — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. AICTE's power to regulate technical education does not include the power to retrospectively alter approved intake after admissions are finalized, as it violates principles of natural justice and legitimate expectation under Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution.

5 Jul 2019

The petitioners, students who had taken admission to engineering colleges in Maharashtra for the academic year 2019-20, challenged the decision of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Permitting Composite Tenders for Civil and Electrical Works in Contractual Matters. The Court held that the decision in Aurangabad Electrical Contractors Association v. State of Maharashtra was incorrect as it interfered with policy decisions without showing arbitrariness or mala fides.

5 Sep 2019

The case arose from a reference by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court questioning the correctness of an earlier decision in Writ Petition No. 3...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Experience in DOT/BSNL/MTNL — Condition Held to Be Reasonable and Not Arbitrary. The court upheld the employer's discretion to set specialized experience requirements for earthing work in telecom exchanges.

6 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Marathwada Radio Communication Systems, challenged a tender condition issued by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) for earthing work ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Sleeper Manufacturers Challenging Railway's Rejection of Tenders for Non-Compliance with Technical Specifications. Court upholds Railway's right to prescribe and enforce technical conditions in tender documents, finding no arbitrariness or mala fides in the rejection.

10 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by companies engaged in the manufacture of railway sleepers, challenging the rejection of their tenders...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)