High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Experience in DOT/BSNL/MTNL — Condition Held to Be Reasonable and Not Arbitrary. The court upheld the employer's discretion to set specialized experience requirements for earthing work in telecom exchanges.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 137
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Marathwada Radio Communication Systems, challenged a tender condition issued by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) for earthing work in telecom exchanges. The condition required experience in earthing work in DOT/BSNL/MTNL. The petitioner argued that this condition was arbitrary and restrictive. The court, however, found that the condition was reasonable and necessary for ensuring safety and quality in telecom operations. The court noted that earthing is a specialized field and that the employer has the discretion to set eligibility criteria. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - Judicial Review of Tender Conditions - Reasonableness - The court examined whether a tender condition requiring experience in earthing work in DOT/BSNL/MTNL was arbitrary. Held that the condition was reasonable and not arbitrary, as it was based on the need for specialized experience in the telecom sector. (Paras 1-3)

B) Contract Law - Tender - Eligibility Criteria - Experience Requirement - The condition requiring experience in DOT/BSNL/MTNL was challenged as restrictive. The court held that the condition was not arbitrary and was within the employer's discretion to ensure quality and safety. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the condition in a tender notice requiring experience in earthing work in DOT/BSNL/MTNL is arbitrary and unreasonable, and whether the court should interfere with such a condition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition was dismissed. The court held that the condition was reasonable and not arbitrary.

Law Points

  • Tender conditions
  • Reasonableness
  • Arbitrariness
  • Judicial review
  • Experience requirement
  • Turnover requirement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (03) 17

WRIT PETITION NO.7260 OF 2005

2006-03-06

Kshitij R. Vyas, C.J., Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.

Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni with Mrs. L.B. Patne for the Petitioner

Marathwada Radio Communication Systems

D. G. M. BSNL, Ratnagiri & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging tender condition

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of tender condition requiring experience in DOT/BSNL/MTNL

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the condition as arbitrary and restrictive

Issues

Whether the tender condition requiring experience in DOT/BSNL/MTNL is arbitrary and unreasonable

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the condition was arbitrary and restrictive

Ratio Decidendi

Tender conditions requiring specialized experience in a particular sector are not arbitrary if they are reasonably related to the nature of work and safety requirements.

Judgment Excerpts

The object of earthing is to ensure inter alia, the safety of operational and maintenance personnel and of the users of facilities against hazardous voltages.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging the tender condition. The court heard the matter and dismissed the petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Experience in DOT/BSNL/MTNL — Condition Held to Be Reasonable and Not Arbitrary. The court upheld the employer's discretion to set specialized experience requirements for earthing...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and Mother-in-law for Dowry Death and Cruelty. Section 304-B IPC conviction sustained as death occurred within seven years of marriage and cruelty for dowry was proved.