Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

15 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation for Ring Road Under MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Not Acted Upon Within Stipulated Period. Reservation of land for 24.0 m wide Ring Road under Development Plan of Sawantwadi City lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated within 12 months of purchase notice under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

25 Apr 2017

The petitioners, Rabiya Raju Bagwan and Hawabi Shabuddin Sayyed, owned land bearing Survey No.55, Hissa No.9 and Survey No.24A, Hissa No.1/7 (CTS No.4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Builders' Challenge to NMC's Refusal to Sanction Building Plans Based on Deemed Sanction Under Section 45(4) of MRTP Act. Court holds that failure to communicate objections within prescribed period results in deemed sanction, and subsequent refusal is invalid.

21 Apr 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Gowardhan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Vedbhoomi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. against t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

19 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Society Members Against Unauthorized Construction and Demolition by Developer. Members have locus standi to challenge illegal construction; administrator must act lawfully.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who are members of the Linking Road Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the unauthorized construction and demo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for De-reservation of Land Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 Due to Non-Acquisition Within 10 Years and Failure to Act on Purchase Notice. The court held that the reservation for playground and recreational activities lapsed as the Planning Authority failed to acquire the land within six months of the purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

18 Dec 2006

The petitioners, owners of four plots of land at Rajapeth, Amravati, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation of their lands f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.

12 Mar 2021

The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Restaurant Construction Without Sanctioned Plan. Court Holds That Construction of a Temporary Structure for Restaurant Business Does Not Require Prior Approval Under Section 347 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and That the Corporation Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice Before Demolition.

28 Sep 2018

The appellants, M/s Rasraj Restaurant (a partnership firm) and its partners, filed an appeal against the order of the trial court refusing to grant an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Inordinate Delay in Granting Permission to Change Land Use from Railway Reservation to Amenities Under DC Regulations. Held that the Corporation's failure to decide the application within a reasonable time amounts to arbitrary exercise of power and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

13 Mar 2014

The petitioners, Wadhwa Residency Private Limited and Mr. Manohar M. Chhabria, owned a large plot of land in Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was designated as...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 44(1)(i) of Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 as Ultra Vires Registration Act, 1908. Circular requiring NOC from Gram Panchayat for registration of sale deeds quashed for lack of statutory authority.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra ...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)