Search Results for "Collector permission"

1751 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1751 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Auction Notice Without Following Section 63 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1956 Invalid. Appellants' Long-Standing Possession and Licenses for Brick Manufacturing on Government Land Protected.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants, who are brick makers and kavelu makers, against the State of Maharashtra. The appellants ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Disqualification Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Inquiry.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by members of the Gram Panchayat of village Krishna, challenging an order dated 23rd April 2010 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand and Order in Writ Petition by Petitioner Against State of Maharashtra Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Due to Time-Barred Proceedings and Erroneous Computation

The Petitioner, challenged Demand Notices and an Order by the Collector of Stamps and CCRA under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, alleging a deficit i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal by Accused Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Challenge Hinges on Proof of Demand and Credibility of Complainant.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleg...