Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Disqualification Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Inquiry.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 109
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by members of the Gram Panchayat of village Krishna, challenging an order dated 23rd April 2010 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, in Appeal No.28/B.V.P.Act 35(3)(c)/2009. The petitioners were disqualified under Section 35(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The dispute arose from a complaint by respondent nos.1 and 2, who were original appellants before the Commissioner. The Collector had conducted an inquiry and submitted a report, but the Additional Commissioner passed the disqualification order without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The petitioners argued that the order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice. The court noted that the Additional Commissioner had not given any hearing to the petitioners before passing the order. The court held that the order was unsustainable and set it aside, remanding the matter back to the Additional Commissioner for fresh consideration after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The court directed that the matter be decided expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of communication of the order.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Natural Justice - Right to Hearing - Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, Section 35(3)(c) - Disqualification of elected members of Gram Panchayat - The Additional Commissioner passed an order disqualifying the petitioners without giving them an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice - Held that the order is unsustainable and set aside (Paras 1-5).

B) Local Self-Government - Disqualification of Members - Inquiry by Collector - Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, Section 35(3)(c) - The Collector conducted an inquiry and submitted a report, but the Additional Commissioner passed the disqualification order without hearing the affected members - Held that the order is vitiated for non-compliance with natural justice (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of disqualification passed by the Additional Commissioner under Section 35(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed both writ petitions, set aside the order dated 23rd April 2010 passed by the Additional Commissioner, and remanded the matter back to the Additional Commissioner for fresh consideration after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The court directed that the matter be decided expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of communication of the order.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to hearing
  • Disqualification of elected members
  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1959
  • Section 35(3)(c)
  • Inquiry by Collector
  • Appellate jurisdiction of Commissioner
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (08) 150

Writ Petition No.2112 of 2010 and Writ Petition No.2169 of 2010

2010-08-18

R.M. Borde

Mr.C.A.Joshi, Mr.F.T.Mirza, Mr.D.P.Thakre, Mr.D.L.Dharmadhikari

Metha s/o Damla Chavhan and others (in WP 2112/2010); Vilas s/o Namdeo Ingole and another (in WP 2169/2010)

Smt.Shobha w/o Vilas Bodkhe and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging disqualification order passed by Additional Commissioner under Section 35(3)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the disqualification order dated 23rd April 2010 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division.

Filing Reason

The Additional Commissioner disqualified the petitioners without affording them an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Collector conducted an inquiry and submitted a report. The Additional Commissioner passed the disqualification order in appeal.

Issues

Whether the order of disqualification passed without hearing the petitioners is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given. Respondents supported the order.

Ratio Decidendi

An order of disqualification under Section 35(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the affected members, violates principles of natural justice and is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Additional Commissioner has not given any hearing to the petitioners before passing the order of disqualification. The order passed by the Additional Commissioner is unsustainable and is required to be quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The Collector conducted an inquiry and submitted a report. Respondent nos.1 and 2 filed an appeal before the Additional Commissioner, who passed the disqualification order on 23rd April 2010. The petitioners challenged this order by filing writ petitions before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959: 35(3)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Gujarat Prohibition Act Interim Custody Case; Section 98(2) Not Absolute Bar to Release of Vehicle. Seized Ashok Leyland Truck Found Transporting 8,064 Bottles of IMFL; Owner Entitled to Seek Interim Custody Under Secti...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Water Body in Public Interest Litigation. Court orders expeditious action under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 for restoration of Vari Poramboke land.