Search Results for "trade and occupation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "trade and occupation"

652 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 652 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Section 133 CrPC Proceedings Initiated Based on Panchayat Complaint — Dispute Over Fencing on Private Property Not a Public Nuisance Under Section 133 CrPC. The court held that proceedings under Section 133 CrPC cannot be initiated for a private property dispute where there is a civil dispute over title and possession, and the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before acting on a police report.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Alexio Travasso, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Pro...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Criminal Revision Application Against Conviction Under Sections 44, 25, 26 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. Conviction Challenged by Accused Nos.3 and 4 was Upheld by Sessions Court, and Revision Filed in High Court.

2 Apr 2025

The revision application was filed by the applicants, who were original accused nos.3 and 4, challenging the judgment dated 23.08.2002 passed by the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust Resolution Requiring Use of Port-Provided Labour. The resolution dated 25th June 2002 requiring stevedoring licensees to use labour provided by the Port Trust is valid under Section 42 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, and does not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

11 Jan 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging a resolution dated 25th June 2002 and a subsequent communication d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MCGM Demand Notice for Unauthorised Construction Penalty Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Section 53(1) of MMC Act, 1888 does not empower the Corporation to levy penalty for unauthorised construction after the fact; remedy lies in demolition under Section 351 or regularisation under DCR.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Zenith Tins Private Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing, challenged a demand notice dated 20th January 2015 issued by the Muni...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Section 133 CrPC Proceedings Initiated Based on Panchayat Complaint — Dispute Over Temporary Fencing on Private Property Not a Public Nuisance. The court held that proceedings under Section 133 CrPC are not maintainable for private property disputes and quashed the same under Article 227 and Section 482 CrPC.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Alexio Travasso, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Demands Under Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953; Considers Whether Onshore Offices of an Offshore Mining Company Are Commercial Establishments. Issues involved interpretation of 'commercial establishment' under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, and 'employee' and 'establishment' under the Labour Welfare Fund Act, along with challenges to exemption rejection and retrospective demand.

19 Jul 2006

The Bombay High Court was seized of a writ petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (the petitioner), a Government company incorporat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Eviction of Licensee in Landmark Tenancy Case. Interpretation of Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act Clarified: Shared Licenses Do Not Confer Tenancy Rights.

17 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Petitioners, legal heir of the original defendant, confirming the eviction order passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decrees Ownership of 800 ITC Shares to Plaintiffs, Finding Transfers Forged and Broker's Claim Unproven. Defendant No.14 Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Forged Transfer Deeds Are Void; Register of Members Ordered to Be Rectified.

3 Aug 2011

The suit concerned a declaration of ownership and rectification of the register of members of ITC Ltd. (Defendant No.1) in respect of 800 shares. Plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Authority Order Under Contract Labour Act — Union Lacks Locus Standi as Individual Workers Not Parties. Petitioner Union failed to establish that it was a recognized union or that the individual workers were parties to the appeal, and the Appellate Authority's order was not shown to be perverse or illegal.

9 Aug 2016

The petitioners, comprising two individual workers (Ambadas Dattatraya Rahinj and Balasaheb Ashok Londhe) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Kamgar Sanghat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Registration of New Cooperative Society Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — No Violation of Natural Justice Found as Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice. The Court held that even if there was a breach of natural justice, the petitioner must demonstrate prejudice, which was not done.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Hiradgaon Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., an existing cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging the registra...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)