Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Section 133 CrPC Proceedings Initiated Based on Panchayat Complaint — Dispute Over Temporary Fencing on Private Property Not a Public Nuisance. The court held that proceedings under Section 133 CrPC are not maintainable for private property disputes and quashed the same under Article 227 and Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 64
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Alexio Travasso, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging proceedings under Section 133 CrPC initiated before the Executive Magistrate in Case No. JM-III/MAG/D2/2/2016. The proceedings were based on a complaint lodged by the respondent No.1, Gisela Fernandes, before the Village Panchayat of Sernabatim on 05/02/2015, asserting ownership of property surveyed under No.64/30 of village Colva and alleging that the petitioner's temporary fencing (iron barbed wire) was causing inconvenience. The petitioner contended that the fencing was temporary and erected to prevent trespassers, and that the dispute was private in nature, not amounting to a public nuisance under Section 133 CrPC. The court, after hearing arguments, held that Section 133 CrPC is intended to remove public nuisances and cannot be used to adjudicate private property disputes. The Executive Magistrate lacked jurisdiction, and the proceedings were quashed. The court allowed the petition, setting aside the proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 133 CrPC - Public Nuisance - Private Property Dispute - The proceedings under Section 133 CrPC are intended to remove public nuisances, not to adjudicate private property disputes. The court held that the temporary fencing on the petitioner's property, even if it caused inconvenience to the respondent, did not constitute a public nuisance as defined under Section 133 CrPC. The Executive Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to entertain the complaint as the dispute was essentially private in nature. (Paras 4-6)

B) Constitutional Law - Article 227 of the Constitution of India - Supervisory Jurisdiction - The High Court can exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to quash proceedings that are without jurisdiction or an abuse of process. The court held that the Section 133 CrPC proceedings were not maintainable and quashed them. (Para 4)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The High Court can invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of the process of court. The court allowed the petition under Section 482 CrPC read with Article 227 to quash the proceedings. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether proceedings under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, initiated on a complaint regarding temporary fencing on private property, are maintainable when the dispute is essentially private in nature and does not involve a public nuisance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashing the proceedings under Section 133 CrPC in Case No. JM-III/MAG/D2/2/2016 before the Executive Magistrate.

Law Points

  • Section 133 CrPC
  • public nuisance
  • private property
  • temporary fencing
  • Executive Magistrate jurisdiction
  • Article 227 Constitution of India
  • Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-GOA:449

Criminal Writ Petition No. 176 of 2018

2019-02-15

Nutan D. Sardessai

2019:BHC-GOA:449

Shri D.D. Zaveri for petitioner; Shri Pravin Faldessai, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents No.2 and 3; respondent No.1 present in person

Mr. Alexio Travasso

Gisela Fernandes, State, Through its Police Inspector, Colva Police Station, The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Bombay at Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 CrPC challenging proceedings under Section 133 CrPC.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings under Section 133 CrPC initiated before the Executive Magistrate in Case No. JM-III/MAG/D2/2/2016.

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that the proceedings under Section 133 CrPC were not tenable as the dispute was private in nature and did not constitute a public nuisance.

Issues

Whether proceedings under Section 133 CrPC are maintainable for a dispute over temporary fencing on private property? Whether the Executive Magistrate had jurisdiction to entertain the complaint?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the temporary fencing was to prevent trespassers and the dispute was private, not a public nuisance under Section 133 CrPC. Respondent No.1 argued that the fencing caused inconvenience and the proceedings were valid.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 133 CrPC is intended to remove public nuisances and cannot be invoked for private property disputes. The Executive Magistrate lacks jurisdiction to entertain such complaints. The High Court can quash such proceedings under Article 227 and Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code takes exception to the proceedings under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure initiated before the Executive Magistrate in case No.JM-III/MAG/D2/2/2016 at the instance of the petitioner. Briefly stated it was the petitioner's case that the proceedings under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, 'Code' for short, was not tenable based on the complaint lodged by the respondent No.1 before the Village Panchayat of Sernabatim.

Procedural History

The respondent No.1 filed an application before the Village Panchayat of Sernabatim on 05/02/2015. Based on that, proceedings under Section 133 CrPC were initiated before the Executive Magistrate in Case No. JM-III/MAG/D2/2/2016. The petitioner then filed the present Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 and Section 482 CrPC challenging those proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 227
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 133, Section 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Section 133 CrPC Proceedings Initiated Based on Panchayat Complaint — Dispute Over Temporary Fencing on Private Property Not a Public Nuisance. The court held that proceedings under Section 133 CrPC are not maintain...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Compromise in Non-Compoundable Offences Under Section 482 CrPC Permissible to Secure Ends of Justice. The court held that matri...