High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Criminal Revision Application Against Conviction Under Sections 44, 25, 26 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. Conviction Challenged by Accused Nos.3 and 4 was Upheld by Sessions Court, and Revision Filed in High Court.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The revision application was filed by the applicants, who were original accused nos.3 and 4, challenging the judgment dated 23.08.2002 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad in Criminal Appeal No.03 of 1997. The appellate judgment confirmed the judgment dated 31.12.1996 in Regular Criminal Case No.324 of 1988, whereby the trial court convicted the applicants for offences under Sections 44 read with 25 and 26 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and sentenced each to rigorous imprisonment for one and a half years and fine of Rs.1,000/-. The revision application was heard by the High Court of Bombay, and judgment was delivered on April 2, 2025. No further details of the court's reasoning or decision are extractable from the provided text.

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 390 OF 2002

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 75

Criminal Revision Application No. 390 of 2002

2025-04-02

Milind N. Jadhav

2025 BHC

Ganesh K. Gole, Ateet Shirodkar, Kunjan Makwana for Applicants; Abhay L. Patki for Respondent No.1; Dhanalakshmi Krishnaiyer, APP for Respondent No.2-State

Shree P. A. Parekh and Shree M. Chattarji

Maharashtra Pollution Control Board and Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Application against conviction and sentence under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of conviction and sentence

Filing Reason

Applicants were convicted by the Trial Court and their appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Court

Previous Decisions

Trial Court (Regular Criminal Case No.324 of 1988) convicted applicants on 31.12.1996; Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad (Criminal Appeal No.03 of 1997) confirmed the conviction on 23.08.2002

Judgment Excerpts

Revision Application is filed by Applicants – original Accused Nos.3 and 4 challenging the judgement dated 23.08.2002 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad in Criminal Appeal No.03 of 1997 whereby judgment dated 31.12.1996 in Regular Criminal Case No.324 of 1988 has been confirmed.

Procedural History

Regular Criminal Case No.324 of 1988 decided on 31.12.1996 by trial court convicting the applicants; Criminal Appeal No.03 of 1997 filed, and the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad dismissed the appeal on 23.08.2002 confirming conviction; Applicants filed Criminal Revision Application No.390 of 2002 before High Court of Bombay.

Acts & Sections

  • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974: 44, 25, 26
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Criminal Revision Application Against Conviction Under Sections 44, 25, 26 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. Conviction Challenged by Accused Nos.3 and 4 was Upheld by Sessions Court, and Revis...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 506 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not suppor...