Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute Over Member Access to Documents. Right of Members to Inspect and Obtain Copies of Society Records Under Section 147 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 is a Statutory Right Not Subject to Unreasonable Restrictions.

The appellant, Sadashivrao Mandlik Kagal Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a specified cooperative society engaged in sugar manufacturing, appeale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CBI Investigation in Bhima Koregaon Case — Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Not Required for CBI Officers. CBI Investigation Valid Under DSPE Act as Section 6A Struck Down by Supreme Court.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by individuals (Anant Pandurang Kale, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Naveen Kumar Rai and Siraj Razzak Bagwan, Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Fair Compensation in Appeal Against Enhanced Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Cross-Objections Seeking Higher Rate Considered Alongside State's Challenge to Reference Court's Award of Rs.1,500 per sq.m.

The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Village Padghe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for the New Bombay Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Liquor Vendors Are Not 'Buyers' Under Section 206C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that excise contractors acquiring arrack under state-controlled system are excluded from definition of 'buyer' under Explanation (a)(iii) of Section 206C.

The appeal arose from a dispute under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Prosecution to Refresh Witness Memory Using Section 161 CrPC Statement During Examination-in-Chief. Use of Section 161 Statement for Refreshing Memory Violates Section 162 CrPC and Section 159 Evidence Act.

The petitioner, Meena Tuyekar, the accused in a corruption case, challenged an order dated 18.1.2024 passed by the trial court allowing the Public Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Dismissal of Review in Kulkarni Watan Land Regrant Case. Decides on Rights of Purchaser Versus Successors of Original Watandar Under Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950.

The dispute involved lands bearing Survey Nos. 135 and 144 at Jamda, Jalgaon, originally held as Kulkarni Watan. In 1944, the vendor Ramchandra Tembul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Mumbai Quashes Process in Dishonour of Cheque Cases for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. — Accused Residing Outside Magistrate's Jurisdiction Requires Mandatory Enquiry Before Issuance of Process.

The petitioners, ASR Systems Private Ltd. and its Managing Director Rohit Wadhwa, were original accused in two complaints filed by Kimberly Clark Hygi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Admiralty Suit for Recovery of Value of Goods Lost Due to Non-Issuance of Bill of Lading. Claim Against Vessel Owner and Agent for Breach of Duty Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act is Examined.

This admiralty suit was filed by the plaintiff, Geetanjali Woollen Pvt. Ltd., seeking recovery of US$ 57,860 with interest for the loss of export good...