Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

1178 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1178 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Interest and Escalation Claims. Court holds that interest under Section 34 CPC is discretionary and that escalation claims not pleaded cannot be awarded.

The dispute arose out of a contract for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A in Goa awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Interest Rate from 12% to 9% in Contractor's Recovery Suit Against State. The court held that interest under Section 34 CPC must be reasonable and not excessive, reducing the rate to 9% per annum.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contractor, for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit by Cotton Corporation Against Textile Mill for Unpaid Price of Imported Cotton. Court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal sum with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of suit till payment.

The plaintiff, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, a government undertaking and canalising agency for import of cotton, filed a suit for recovery of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Suit for Damages Against Foreign Company. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Contract and Cause of Action, Not by Place of Performance of Warranty Obligations.

The appellant, Kalyanji Walji Private Ltd., filed a suit for damages against Sortex Limited (a UK company), Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Declaration for Sugar Factory Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Collector Failed to Prepare Independent Report or Submit Recommendations, Relying Instead on Beneficiary's Chart, Rendering Section 6 Declaration Invalid.

The petitioners, Sukumar M. Khot and others, challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published on 23 June 2005, wh...