Bombay High Court Dismisses Executrix's Suit for Copyright Infringement of Song from Film 'Talash' — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Ownership of Copyright in Cinematographic Film Under Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that the plaintiff, claiming as executrix of the deceased producer, did not prove that the copyright in the song vested in the estate, as the song was composed by a third party and the producer had only commissioned the film.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Rupalli P. Shah, claiming to be the executrix of the last Will and testament of O.P. Ralhan (deceased), filed a suit seeking to restrain defendants Adani Wilmer Ltd and Saregama India Ltd from infringing the copyright in the song 'Meri Duniya Hai Maa Tere Aanchal Mein' from the film 'Talash' produced by the deceased in 1969. The plaintiff alleged that the copyright in the song vested in the estate of the deceased and that the defendants were using the song without license. The defendants contended that the plaintiff had no ownership of the copyright in the song, as the music was composed by a third party (R.D. Burman) and the lyrics were written by a third party (Majrooh Sultanpuri), and the producer had not obtained any assignment of the copyright in the musical work. The court analyzed the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, particularly Sections 13, 14, 17, and 19, and held that the producer of a cinematograph film is the first owner of the copyright in the film, but the copyright in the underlying musical work remains with the composer unless there is a written assignment. The plaintiff failed to produce any assignment or evidence that the copyright in the song was transferred to the deceased. The court also noted that the plaintiff had not impleaded the music composer or lyricist as parties. The court dismissed the Notice of Motion, finding that the plaintiff had not made out a prima facie case for injunction, and the balance of convenience was in favor of the defendants. The suit was also dismissed as not maintainable.

Headnote

A) Copyright Law - Ownership of Copyright in Cinematograph Film - Section 13, 14, 17 Copyright Act, 1957 - The plaintiff, claiming as executrix of the deceased producer, sought to restrain defendants from using a song from the film 'Talash'. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the copyright in the song vested in the estate of the deceased, as the song was composed by a third party (music composer) and the producer had not obtained an assignment of the copyright in the musical work. The court emphasized that under Section 17, the producer of a cinematograph film is the first owner of the copyright in the film, but the copyright in the underlying musical work remains with the composer unless there is a written assignment. (Paras 4-10)

B) Civil Procedure - Interim Injunction - Notice of Motion - The court disposed of the Notice of Motion finally at the ad-interim stage as all material was placed before it. The court found that the plaintiff had not made out a prima facie case for grant of injunction, as the balance of convenience was in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff would not suffer irreparable loss. (Paras 1, 11-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff, as executrix of the deceased producer O.P. Ralhan, is entitled to restrain the defendants from using the song 'Meri Duniya Hai Maa Tere Aanchal Mein' from the film 'Talash' on the ground of copyright infringement, and whether the plaintiff has established ownership of the copyright in the song.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Notice of Motion is dismissed. The suit is also dismissed as not maintainable. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Copyright ownership in cinematograph film vests with producer
  • but copyright in underlying musical work remains with composer unless assigned
  • Section 13
  • 14
  • 17 Copyright Act
  • 1957
  • Assignment of copyright must be in writing
  • Section 19 Copyright Act
  • Executrix must prove title to sue
  • Burden of proof on plaintiff to establish ownership
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012:BHC-OS:6954

Notice of Motion (L) No.719 of 2012 in Suit (L) No.540 of 2012

2012-05-08

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.

2012:BHC-OS:6954

Mr. R.M. Kadam, Sr. Adv a/w A.S. Kamat for the plaintiff; Mr. M.R. Baya for defendant No.1; Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar, Sr. Adv a/w Mr. Chakrapani Mishra and R.A. Iyer i/by M/s. Khaitan & Co for defendant No.2

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for copyright infringement seeking permanent injunction

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from infringing copyright in the song 'Meri Duniya Hai Maa Tere Aanchal Mein' from the film 'Talash'

Filing Reason

Plaintiff claimed that defendants were using the song without license, infringing the copyright vested in the estate of the deceased producer O.P. Ralhan

Issues

Whether the plaintiff has established ownership of copyright in the song 'Meri Duniya Hai Maa Tere Aanchal Mein' from the film 'Talash' Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the song

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that as executrix of the deceased producer, she is entitled to the copyright in the song, which was part of the cinematograph film produced by the deceased. Defendants argued that the copyright in the musical work (song) belongs to the composer and lyricist, not the producer, and the plaintiff failed to produce any assignment.

Ratio Decidendi

The producer of a cinematograph film is the first owner of the copyright in the film under Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957, but the copyright in the underlying musical work (song) remains with the composer unless there is a written assignment under Section 19. The plaintiff, as executrix, failed to prove any assignment of the copyright in the song to the deceased producer, and therefore, the plaintiff has no right to sue for infringement of the song.

Judgment Excerpts

Since entire material is placed before the Court, at this adinterim stage itself, the Motion is heard finally and disposed off by this order. The plaintiff failed to produce any assignment or evidence that the copyright in the song was transferred to the deceased.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Suit (L) No.540 of 2012 along with Notice of Motion (L) No.719 of 2012 seeking interim injunction. The motion was heard finally at the ad-interim stage and disposed of by this judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Copyright Act, 1957: 13, 14, 17, 19
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Executrix's Suit for Copyright Infringement of Song from Film 'Talash' — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Ownership of Copyright in Cinematographic Film Under Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that the plaintiff, claiming...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tenders for Supplementary Nutrition Under ICDS Scheme — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary State Action. Tender cancellation without notice to petitioners and without valid ...