Search Results for "Bombay Police Act 1951"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Bombay Police Act 1951"

671 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 671 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Bombay Police Act for Non-Compliance with Section 56(1)(a)(b) and Failure to Consider Acquittal. The court held that the show cause notice and externment order must explicitly state that the activities caused alarm, danger or harm to person or property, and that the authority must consider acquittal in one of the cases.

9 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Sohan s/o Vijay Lalbegi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging an externment order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ahmed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 — Failure to Supply Copies of In-Camera Statements and Insufficient Notice Period Violate Natural Justice.

20 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Shivaji Baburao Ghadage, challenged an externment order dated 13th July 2010 passed by the Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate, Karad,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Material Particulars in Show Cause Notices under Bombay Police Act, 1951. Show cause notices must contain date, month, time and place of alleged incidents; externment orders cannot rely on extraneous material not mentioned in the notice.

22 Sep 2005

The Bombay High Court decided three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The petitioners we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Impersonation and Cheating Case — Accused Posing as Police Officer Defrauded Informant of Rs. 1,50,000 for False Promise of Police Constable Job.

9 Jun 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Vilas Narayan Ganvir challenging his conviction and sentence under Sections 171, 419 and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Denial of Public Entertainment Licence for Restaurant with Valid FLIII Licence — Parking Requirement Not a Valid Ground Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The Court held that the only precondition for Public Entertainment Licence under Rule 3 of the Public Entertainment Rules is possession of a liquor licence, and the Commissioner cannot impose additional conditions like parking.

22 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Rajeev S. Mehta, is the sole proprietor of M/s. Senorita Bar and Restaurant, which holds various licences including an Eating House Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions to Quash Externment Orders in Gangakhed Cases — Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 56(1)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The court held that failure to record satisfaction that witnesses are unwilling to depose against the petitioners due to fear of violence renders the externment order invalid.

7 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns four criminal writ petitions filed by Satish Limbaji Ghobale, Shubham @ Dada Dayayand Ghobale, Govind @ Jaypal Limbaji Ghobale, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Material to Show Alarm or Danger in the Area — Petitioner's Criminal Activities Did Not Justify Externment Under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951

15 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Mr. Masiullah Mohid Idrishi, challenged an externment order dated 27.11.2009 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone IV, Mum...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can File Consumer Complaint Jointly with Assured.

9 Aug 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing the hotel's appeal against an order of the State Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

6 May 2026

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions for Performance Licence in Eating Houses Under Bombay Police Act, 1951 — Licensing Authority Cannot Refuse Licence Based on Unsubstantiated Moral Grounds. The court held that refusal to grant performance licence under Rule 100 of 1999 Rules on the ground of likely immoral activities without specific evidence is arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

11 Jan 2012

The petitioners, Shri Ramesh S. Alva and Omprakash Nanikaram Vaswani, are proprietors of eating houses in Navi Mumbai, holding valid licences under Se...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)