Search Results for "Special Court (POCSO)"

489 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 489 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajaykumar s/o Sambhunath Naik, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in POCSO Case. The court held that the case does not fall within the 'rarest of rare' category and the possibility of reformation cannot be ruled out.

The case involves the confirmation of death sentence and appeals against conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4107 OF 2024

The petitioner, Anna Maruti Shinde, aged 52 years, unemployed, residing at Kharvai, Badlapur East, District Thane, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 41...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was uncorroborated and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Rohidas Manik Chavhan and Pravin Pundlik Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, in Special Case No.4/2015 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case for Stalking Due to Lack of Repeated Conduct. Single Instance of Catching Hand and Expressing Love Does Not Constitute Stalking Under Section 354-D IPC as Essential Element of 'Repeated' Follow-Up Not Proven.

The appellant, Bhushan Wadaskar, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Amravati, for the offence of stalking under Section 354-D of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order Summoning Additional Evidence in Asaram Bapu Conviction Case. Section 391 CrPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case or to Introduce Evidence That Could Have Been Produced at Trial.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated 10.02.2022. The High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...