CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4107 OF 2024

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Anna Maruti Shinde, aged 52 years, unemployed, residing at Kharvai, Badlapur East, District Thane, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4107 of 2024 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petition was heard by a division bench comprising Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Dr. Neela Gokhale. Mr. Amit Katarnaware with Ms. Pooja Dongare and Mr. Aditya Katarnaware appeared for the petitioner, while Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate and Special Public Prosecutor, assisted by Mr. Hiten S. Venegavkar, Public Prosecutor, and Mrs. P.P. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, represented the respondent-State. The High Court appointed Mrs. Manjula Rao, Senior Advocate, as amicus curiae, who appeared with Mr. Kunal J. Rane, Mr. Rohan Deshmukh, Mr. Pratik Deomore, and Ms. Latika Chitre. After hearing the parties, the Court reserved judgment on 13 March 2025 and pronounced its order on 7 April 2025. The specific grounds of challenge, the relief sought, and the final decision are not discernible from the provided extract.

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4107 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 82

Criminal Writ Petition No. 4107 of 2024

2025-04-07

Revati Mohite Dere, Dr. Neela Gokhale

Mr. Amit Katarnaware, Ms. Pooja Dongare, Mr. Aditya Katarnaware, Mr. Amit Desai, Mr. Hiten S. Venegavkar, Mrs. P.P. Shinde, Mrs. Manjula Rao, Mr. Kunal J. Rane, Mr. Rohan Deshmukh, Mr. Pratik Deomore, Ms. Latika Chitre

Anna Maruti Shinde

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials in Cooperative Bank Fraud Case; Inspection Report Obtained Despite Stay Order Cannot Be Basis for Prosecution. The Court Holds That Private Individual Lacked Statutory Authority Under Section 81(5B...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Act Case; Denies Amended Benefits to Landowners as Awards Predated 30.4.1982. Section 23(1A), 23(2) and 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Inapplicable Where Collector's and Reference Court ...