Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Considering Consensual Relationship and Marriage Proposal. Court held that where a minor victim had a consensual relationship and later married the accused after attaining majority, bail under Section 439 CrPC can be granted for offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n) IPC, Section 6 POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 11 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Thippeswamy @ Thipeshi, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking regular bail in Crime No.103/2021 registered by Jagalur Police Station, Davanagere, for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), and Sections 9 and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. The case arose from a complaint by the father of the victim girl, Padmavathi, aged about 16 years, who went missing from her home on 14.06.2021. The complainant suspected the petitioner's involvement. The police initially registered a case under Section 363 IPC, and later added other sections after the victim was recovered. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The petitioner's counsel argued that the victim and petitioner were in love and had a consensual relationship, and that the victim had voluntarily accompanied the petitioner. It was also submitted that the victim had attained majority and had married the petitioner, and that the marriage was registered. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court, after hearing both sides, noted that the victim was aged 16 years at the time of the incident, but the relationship appeared consensual. The court also considered that the victim had since become major and had married the petitioner, and that the marriage was registered. The court held that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, and granted bail subject to conditions including executing a personal bond, furnishing sureties, appearing before the court as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without permission. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Consensual Relationship - Petitioner sought bail for offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n) IPC, Section 6 POCSO Act, Sections 9 and 11 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act - Victim aged 16 years at time of incident, but relationship was consensual and she later married petitioner - Court granted bail considering that victim is now major, married to petitioner, and no purpose served by further incarceration - Held that bail can be granted on stringent conditions (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under IPC, POCSO Act, and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, considering the consensual nature of the relationship and the fact that the victim is now major and married to the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be released on bail in Crime No.103/2021 (S.C.No.149/2021) pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Davanagere, subject to executing a personal bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties, and conditions including appearing before the court as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without permission.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • Consensual relationship with minor
  • POCSO Act Section 6
  • Prohibition of Child Marriage Act Sections 9 and 11
  • IPC Sections 363 and 376(2)(n)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (03) 16

Criminal Petition No.9980/2021

2022-03-05

H.P. Sandesh

V. Lakshmi Kanth Rao (for petitioner), Vinayaka V.S., HCGP (for respondent)

Thippeswamy @ Thipeshi

State by Jagalur P.S., Rep. by State Public Prosecutor

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Regular bail for the petitioner in Crime No.103/2021

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested for allegedly kidnapping and sexually assaulting a minor girl

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under IPC, POCSO Act, and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the victim and petitioner were in love and had a consensual relationship, and the victim voluntarily accompanied the petitioner. The victim has since attained majority and married the petitioner, and the marriage is registered. State opposed bail citing the seriousness of the offences under POCSO Act and IPC.

Ratio Decidendi

Bail can be granted under Section 439 CrPC when the relationship between the accused and the minor victim was consensual, the victim has since attained majority and married the accused, and no useful purpose is served by further incarceration.

Judgment Excerpts

The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that the complainant, who is the father of the victim girl, filed a complaint stating that his daughter Padmavathi, who is aged about 16 years is pursuing SSLC. The victim girl is now major and she has married the petitioner and the marriage is also registered. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the petitioner in custody.

Procedural History

The petitioner was arrested in Crime No.103/2021 registered by Jagalur Police Station for offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n) IPC, Section 6 POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 11 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. He filed a bail petition under Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 25.02.2022, and the order was pronounced on 05.03.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 363, 376(2)(n)
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act): 6
  • Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006: 9, 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Claim for Trust Benefits After Company Closure. Closure of Company Constitutes 'Leaves the Service' Under Trust Deed, Employees Cease to Be Beneficiaries.
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Considering Consensual Relationship and Marriage Proposal. Court held that where a minor victim had a consensual relationship and later married the accused after attaining majority, bail under...