COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017
28 Jan 2020The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...
Search Results for "Building Plan Sanction"
857 result(s) found
Found 857 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Inclusion of Polytechnic in Centralised Admission Process Despite State's Non-Issuance of Government Resolution — AICTE Approval Sufficient for CAP Participation Under AICTE Act, 1987. The court held that AICTE approval is sufficient and the State cannot withhold inclusion based on pending policy decisions, directing the State to issue the GR and include the petitioner in CAP forthwith.
9 Jul 2014The petitioner, Dr. D.Y. Patil Pratishthan's Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Polytechnic, a trust running an educational institution, filed a writ petition ...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Writ Petition for TDR Against Construction of Development Plan Road. Municipal Corporation's Rejection of TDR Application Set Aside as Unreasonable and Contrary to Development Control Regulations.
15 Mar 2019The petitioner, M/s. Siddhi Real Estate Developers, a partnership firm, constructed a development plan road at its own cost within the limits of Thane...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.
3 Aug 2017This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Permission for Development on Recreational Ground in Public Interest Litigation. Section 47 MRTP Act Appeal Allowed Without Proper Application of Mind and Contrary to Development Plan Reservation.
10 Jun 2011The judgment arises from a public interest litigation filed by residents living around the Cooperage plot in Mumbai, represented by the Oval Cooperage...
- 86
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Property Tax Demand for Period Prior to Completion of Construction in Mysuru City Corporation. Property tax under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 can only be levied from the date of completion of building, not from the date of approval of plan.
24 Nov 2023The petitioner, M/s B M Habitat, a partnership firm represented by its partner Deepak Lulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal for Injunction Against Demolition of Unauthorized Construction. Builder who constructed seven upper floors without permission and inducted flat purchasers without occupation certificate is not entitled to equitable relief of temporary injunction.
27 Apr 2005The appellant, M/s. Leela Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant a temporary injunctio...
- 161
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Construction in CRZ Area, Upholds NGT Order on Environmental Clearance Validity. Construction of hotel building in Colva, Goa, held not to violate CRZ Notification 1991 as it was within permissible floor space index and setback requirements.
19 Jun 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 751 of 2008 filed by Theodore Fernandes and Goencarancho Vorixtte Awaz (an association) ag...
- 168
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Arbitrator's Refusal of Interim Relief in Development Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in order denying interim injunction to developer under Development Agreement dated 3/2/2018.
5 Apr 2023The petitioner, M/s Viraj Kamman Real Estate Developers Pvt Ltd, a real estate development company, entered into a Development Agreement dated 3/2/201...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.
8 Oct 2010The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...
- 21
