Search Results for "gift deed challenge"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Suit for Coparcenary Property Based on Pre-1956 Female Succession. Widow's acquisition of property under Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 is not a coparcenary asset but her absolute estate under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.08.2019 in O.S. No. 101/2015 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Bagalkot, partl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.

The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit — Upholds Right of Heirs to Seek Impleadment Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC. Court holds that abatement of suit against deceased defendant does not automatically bar substitution of legal representatives if application is made within limitation.

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against several defendants, including Balbhim Govind Deshpande (origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Resolution Prescribing Fees for Permission to Mortgage Occupancy Class II Lands. Condition Imposing Payment of Fees Held Valid Under Section 43 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and Not Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in paper manufacturing, challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Section 34 Petition Against Foreign Award; Preliminary Objection Raised Pending Determination. Arbitration Agreement Existence and Enforcement of Foreign Award Under Part II Also Examined.

The dispute arose from a voyage charter party dated 13 September 2008 between Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Company...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Challenge to MHADA Acquisition of Cessed Buildings for Redevelopment. Tenants Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition and Tender Process Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, tenants of Dattatraya Buildings in Mumbai, filed writ petitions challenging the acquisition of the buildings by the Maharashtra Housi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar under Bombay Moneylenders Act to Nullify Registered Sale Deeds. Multiple writ petitions challenge orders directing reconveyance of agricultural land alleged to be security for unlicensed money lending.

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 21 writ petitions collectively, all challenging orders passed by the Taluka Assistant Registr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...