Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar under Bombay Moneylenders Act to Nullify Registered Sale Deeds. Multiple writ petitions challenge orders directing reconveyance of agricultural land alleged to be security for unlicensed money lending.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 167
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 21 writ petitions collectively, all challenging orders passed by the Taluka Assistant Registrar of Moneylenders cum Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Sections 13B(1) or 13A of the Bombay Moneylenders Act, 1946. The Authority had held that transfers or sales of agricultural fields were by way of security for money lending transactions conducted without a license. Consequently, the sale deeds were declared invalid, and persons in possession were directed to hand over the property to the complainant/debtor or the Authority. The petitioners, who were the purchasers, challenged these orders on the ground of absence of jurisdiction in the Authority. By consent of all parties, only the legal question of jurisdiction was heard at the admission stage. The Court directed a general notice and proceeded to hear the matter finally. The specific question framed was whether Section 13B permits the Authority to deal with immovable properties, ignore or nullify registered sale deeds, and order delivery of possession back to the executors or to itself. For convenience, the Court relied on the facts of Writ Petition No. 599 of 2006, where a government servant (Patwari) had purchased agricultural lands from multiple debtors who alleged they still possessed and cultivated the lands despite the sale deed, and had repaid the loan but the purchaser refused reconveyance. Brief details of other petitions were also tabulated. The Court reserved judgment on 18 September 2006 and pronounced it on 13 October 2006, but the available excerpt does not include the final decision or reasoning.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Assistant Registrar under the Bombay Moneylenders Act, 1946 has jurisdiction under Section 13B to invalidate registered sale deeds and order reconveyance or delivery of possession to the debtor.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Section 13A of Bombay Moneylenders Act
  • 1946
  • Section 13B of Bombay Moneylenders Act
  • jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar
  • validity of registered sale deeds
  • money lending without license
  • transfer of agricultural land as security
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (10) 101

Writ Petition Nos. 599, 2159, 2345, 2390, 2429, 2556, 2580, 2684, 2882, 2961, 3004, 3062, 3063, 3079, 3112, 3212, 3387, 3796, 4165, 4236 and 4299 of 2006

2006-10-13

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.

M.V. Amale, V.G. Wankhede, C.A. Joshi, V.M. Deshpande, Anil S. Mardikar, N.P. Dhote, S.K. Sable, R.L. Khapre, A.P. Tathod, N.R. Borkar, K.S. Malokar, V.K. Paliwal, S.B. Solat, Amol Mardikar, R.B. Agrawal, M.I. Khan, Liyakat Ali, S.P. Kshirsagar, Shamal Kadu, Learned AGP

Ramesh Dhulatrao Gawhale and Others (Petitioners in various writ petitions)

The State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging orders of Assistant Registrar under Bombay Moneylenders Act declaring sale deeds of agricultural land invalid and directing reconveyance/delivery of possession.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (purchasers) sought to quash orders of Assistant Registrar and establish that the Authority lacked jurisdiction to nullify registered sale deeds.

Filing Reason

The Assistant Registrar held that the sale deeds were by way of security for unlicensed money lending transactions, declared them invalid, and directed petitioners to hand over possession to the debtors or the Authority.

Previous Decisions

Assistant Registrar's orders under Section 13B(1) or reports under Section 13A of the Bombay Moneylenders Act, 1946, holding sale deeds invalid and directing delivery of possession.

Issues

Whether the Assistant Registrar under the Bombay Moneylenders Act, 1946 has jurisdiction under Section 13B to invalidate registered sale deeds and order reconveyance or delivery of possession to the debtor.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether section 13B permits Taluka Assistant Registrar of Moneylenders cum Assistant Registrar of co-operative societies i.e. Authority to deal with immovable properties and to ignore or nullify such a registered sale deeds and order the respective owners to deliver its possession back to its executors or to the Authority. the Authority has held that transfers or sale of agricultural fields were by way of security for money lending transactions without license and hence those sale deeds are found to be invalid and persons in possession have been called upon to handover the possession to the complainant/debtor or to deliver possession to the Authority itself.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed in 2006 challenging orders of the Assistant Registrar. All matters were directed to be placed together, and a general notice was issued. By consent of all parties, only the issue of jurisdiction was heard finally at the admission stage. Rule was made returnable forthwith, and arguments were advanced solely on the legal question.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Moneylenders Act, 1946: 13A, 13B(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Respondent's Application Under Arbitration Act — Jurisdiction Affirmed in Bengaluru.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Remand Order in Criminal Case Where Accused Were Acquitted for Want of Prosecution Evidence. The Sessions Court's order of remand was set aside as it exceeded its jurisdiction in an appeal against acquittal.