Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

2227 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2227 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Jurisdictional Objection in Foreign Award Enforcement — Implied Exclusion of Part I of Arbitration Act Upheld. Parties' choice of London arbitration and English law impliedly excludes Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including section 42, so prior section 34 application in Gujarat does not bar Bombay High Court from hearing enforcement petition under section 48.

5 Oct 2011

The petitioner, Eitzen Bulk A/S, filed a petition under section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Bombay High Court seeking...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2020

18 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from a tender floated by respondent no.1 MIHAN India Ltd. for up-gradation, modernization, operation and management of Dr. Babasaheb...

High Court

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

6 Feb 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Pass Award Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator After Original Arbitrator Failed to Conclude Proceedings Despite Multiple Extensions.

16 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Madhav Structural Engineers Limited, filed a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking term...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Calcutta High Court's Order Appointing Arbitrator Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 11 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Depends on Court as Defined in Section 2(1)(e), Not Merely on Seat Designation in Arbitration Clause.

24 Mar 2022

The appeals arose from orders of the Calcutta High Court dated 13 August 2021 and 4 October 2021. The appellant and respondent had entered into a deve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

13 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable Due to Failure to Issue Prior Notice Under Section 34(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That the Requirement of Prior Notice Is Mandatory and a Condition Precedent for Filing a Section 34 Application.

19 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 t...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)