Search Results for "Execution petition maintainability"

1004 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1004 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012

The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Execution Court Order in Permanent Injunction Case — Decree for Bare Injunction Cannot Be Executed After Road Construction Without Mandatory Injunction or Possession Relief.

The petitioner, Kareppa, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23 March 2015 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Execution Dispute — Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 47 CPC Clarified. Court holds that an order rejecting objection under Section 47 CPC is a decree appealable under Section 96 CPC, not revisable under Section 115 CPC.

The present second appeal is filed by the appellant, original plaintiff, aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge-9 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...