High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 120
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010331982002_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 6

R.F.A. No. 611/2002 c/w R.F.A. Nos. 612/2002, 613/2002, 710/2002, 711/2002, 712/2002 & 504/2002

2013-03-01

Aravind Kumar, J.

V.B. Ravishankar, Shanmukappa, A. Vijay Kumar Bhat, Jagadeesh Goud Patil, Rahamathulla Shariff, S.K.V. Chalapathy, Ramesh Rao, M/s Kesvy & Co.

Sri. Vishwaraj, Smt. Paripoorni, Sri. B.M. Maranna, Sri. B.C. Narayana (since deceased by LRs), Sri. B.M. Byrappa (since deceased by LRs)

Sri. B.M. Byrappa (since deceased by LRs), K.J. Muralidhar, Nagabhushanam Naidu, Smt. N. Rukmini Devi, Smt. Shakuntala Devi, Smt. K.J. Jayalakshmi (since deceased by LRs), B.C. Hanumanthappa, B.C. Ganganna (since deceased by LRs), B.M. Maranna, B.V. Nagaraj, B.C. Narayana (since deceased by LRs), Abdul Rahim Khan, Jayadev, Smt. Haseena Begum, Nawabjan, S. Tajunnissa, John Moses @ Madan Kumar, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

Suit O.S. No. 1949/1980 filed before XXVIII Additional City and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore, dismissed on 29.1.2002. Multiple first appeals (R.F.A. Nos. 611/2002, 612/2002, 613/2002, 710/2002, 711/2002, 712/2002, 504/2002) filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order 41 Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Court upholds demolition of structures built without valid permission under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corpo...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Conscious Possession. The court held that the prosecution failed to comply with Section 50 of NDPS Act and did not establish conscious possession...