Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-11 07:05:30
  • 106
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010331982002_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 6

R.F.A. No. 611/2002 c/w R.F.A. Nos. 612/2002, 613/2002, 710/2002, 711/2002, 712/2002 & 504/2002

2013-03-01

Aravind Kumar, J.

V.B. Ravishankar, Shanmukappa, A. Vijay Kumar Bhat, Jagadeesh Goud Patil, Rahamathulla Shariff, S.K.V. Chalapathy, Ramesh Rao, M/s Kesvy & Co.

Sri. Vishwaraj, Smt. Paripoorni, Sri. B.M. Maranna, Sri. B.C. Narayana (since deceased by LRs), Sri. B.M. Byrappa (since deceased by LRs)

Sri. B.M. Byrappa (since deceased by LRs), K.J. Muralidhar, Nagabhushanam Naidu, Smt. N. Rukmini Devi, Smt. Shakuntala Devi, Smt. K.J. Jayalakshmi (since deceased by LRs), B.C. Hanumanthappa, B.C. Ganganna (since deceased by LRs), B.M. Maranna, B.V. Nagaraj, B.C. Narayana (since deceased by LRs), Abdul Rahim Khan, Jayadev, Smt. Haseena Begum, Nawabjan, S. Tajunnissa, John Moses @ Madan Kumar, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

Suit O.S. No. 1949/1980 filed before XXVIII Additional City and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore, dismissed on 29.1.2002. Multiple first appeals (R.F.A. Nos. 611/2002, 612/2002, 613/2002, 710/2002, 711/2002, 712/2002, 504/2002) filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order 41 Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
partition suit separate possession Section 96 CPC first appeal dismissal of suit joint property

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Explosive Substances Act Case for Unlawful Possession of Hand-Grenade and Detonator. Disclosure Statement Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Held Admissible as Accused Was in Police Custody an... 2026-09-17 03:03:59
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Food Shop Owner in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case Due to Failure to Seek Director Analysis. Accused's Failure to Apply Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Precluded Claim of L... 2026-09-17 03:03:50
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?