Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit in O.S. No. 1949/80. Appeals Filed Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Challenging Trial Court's Rejection of Claim for Partition and Separate Possession.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-20 20:29:16
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010331982002_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 5

R.F.A. No. 611/2002 c/w R.F.A. Nos. 612/2002, 613/2002, 710/2002, 711/2002, 712/2002 & 504/2002

2013-03-01

Justice Aravind Kumar

V.B.Ravishankar, A.Vijaya Kumar Bhat, Shanmukappa, Rehamathulla Shariff, S.K.V.Chalapathy, Srinivas, Ramesh Rao, Jagadeesh Goud Patil

Vishwaraj, Paripoorni (in RFA 611/2002); B.M. Maranna, B.C. Narayana (in RFA 612/2002); B.M. Byrappa (since deceased) through LRs (in RFA 613/2002)

B.M.Byrappa (since deceased) through LRs, K.J.Muralidhar, Nagabhushanam Naidu, N. Rukmini Devi, Shakuntala Devi, K.J. Jayalakshmi, B.C. Hanumanthappa, B.C.Ganganna, B.M. Maranna, B.V. Nagaraj, B.C. Narayana, Abdul Rahim Khan, Jayadev, Haseena Begum, Nawabjan, S. Tajunnissa, John Moses @ Madan Kumar, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suit for partition and separate possession

Remedy Sought

Decree of partition and separate possession of suit property

Previous Decisions

Suit dismissed by XXVIII Addl. City & Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore on 29.1.2002 in O.S. No. 1949/80

Procedural History

Suit O.S. No. 1949/80 for partition and separate possession filed before XXVIII Addl. City & Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore was dismissed on 29.1.2002. Multiple regular first appeals under Section 96 CPC were preferred before the High Court of Karnataka, which were clubbed and heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order 41 Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
partition suit regular first appeal dismissal of suit separate possession Section 96 CPC

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce Under Article 4(8) of Law of Divorce — De Facto Separation Must Be 'Freely Consented' by Both Spouses. Husband's Adultery and Abandonment of Wife Precluded Finding of Free Consent Despite 25 ... 2026-11-01 06:50:33
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Teacher in Minority Institution Against Rejection of Appointment Approval. Government Ban on Recruitment Not Applicable to Minority Educational Institutions Under Article 30. 2026-11-01 06:50:33
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?