HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit in O.S. No. 1949/80. Appeals Filed Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Challenging Trial Court's Rejection of Claim for Partition and Separate Possession.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU

Admin

2026-09-16 09:30:00

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010331982002_1

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 5

R.F.A. No. 611/2002 c/w R.F.A. Nos. 612/2002, 613/2002, 710/2002, 711/2002, 712/2002 & 504/2002

2013-03-01

Justice Aravind Kumar

V.B.Ravishankar, A.Vijaya Kumar Bhat, Shanmukappa, Rehamathulla Shariff, S.K.V.Chalapathy, Srinivas, Ramesh Rao, Jagadeesh Goud Patil

Vishwaraj, Paripoorni (in RFA 611/2002); B.M. Maranna, B.C. Narayana (in RFA 612/2002); B.M. Byrappa (since deceased) through LRs (in RFA 613/2002)

B.M.Byrappa (since deceased) through LRs, K.J.Muralidhar, Nagabhushanam Naidu, N. Rukmini Devi, Shakuntala Devi, K.J. Jayalakshmi, B.C. Hanumanthappa, B.C.Ganganna, B.M. Maranna, B.V. Nagaraj, B.C. Narayana, Abdul Rahim Khan, Jayadev, Haseena Begum, Nawabjan, S. Tajunnissa, John Moses @ Madan Kumar, and others

Nature of Litigation

Suit for partition and separate possession

Remedy Sought

Decree of partition and separate possession of suit property

Previous Decisions

Suit dismissed by XXVIII Addl. City & Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore on 29.1.2002 in O.S. No. 1949/80

Procedural History

Suit O.S. No. 1949/80 for partition and separate possession filed before XXVIII Addl. City & Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore was dismissed on 29.1.2002. Multiple regular first appeals under Section 96 CPC were preferred before the High Court of Karnataka, which were clubbed and heard together.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order 41 Rule 5

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition for Survey and Demarcation of Property — Mandamus Issued to Conduct Survey and Fix Boundaries. Court Holds That Patta Need Not Be in Applicant's Name and Application Can Be Considered Even if Mutation Not Effe... 2026-09-17 05:32:34

High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Employees' Union and Individual Claimant in Company Liquidation Dispute — Upholds Official Liquidator's Decision to Reject Claims as Time-Barred Under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that w... 2026-09-17 05:32:32

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit in O.S. No. 1949/80. Appeals Filed Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Challenging Trial Court's Rejection of Claim for Partition and Separate Possession.

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Previous Decisions

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...