Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit in O.S. No. 1949/80. Appeals Filed Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Challenging Trial Court's Rejection of Claim for Partition and Separate Possession.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 20:16:18
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010331982002_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 5

R.F.A. No. 611/2002 c/w R.F.A. Nos. 612/2002, 613/2002, 710/2002, 711/2002, 712/2002 & 504/2002

2013-03-01

Justice Aravind Kumar

V.B.Ravishankar, A.Vijaya Kumar Bhat, Shanmukappa, Rehamathulla Shariff, S.K.V.Chalapathy, Srinivas, Ramesh Rao, Jagadeesh Goud Patil

Vishwaraj, Paripoorni (in RFA 611/2002); B.M. Maranna, B.C. Narayana (in RFA 612/2002); B.M. Byrappa (since deceased) through LRs (in RFA 613/2002)

B.M.Byrappa (since deceased) through LRs, K.J.Muralidhar, Nagabhushanam Naidu, N. Rukmini Devi, Shakuntala Devi, K.J. Jayalakshmi, B.C. Hanumanthappa, B.C.Ganganna, B.M. Maranna, B.V. Nagaraj, B.C. Narayana, Abdul Rahim Khan, Jayadev, Haseena Begum, Nawabjan, S. Tajunnissa, John Moses @ Madan Kumar, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suit for partition and separate possession

Remedy Sought

Decree of partition and separate possession of suit property

Previous Decisions

Suit dismissed by XXVIII Addl. City & Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore on 29.1.2002 in O.S. No. 1949/80

Procedural History

Suit O.S. No. 1949/80 for partition and separate possession filed before XXVIII Addl. City & Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore was dismissed on 29.1.2002. Multiple regular first appeals under Section 96 CPC were preferred before the High Court of Karnataka, which were clubbed and heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order 41 Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
partition suit regular first appeal dismissal of suit separate possession Section 96 CPC

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit in O.S. No. 1949/80. Appeals Filed Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Challenging Trial Court's Rejection of Claim for Partition and Sepa... 2026-08-02 20:16:18
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Four Family Members Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen, Recovery of Weapon, and Abscondence Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC. 2026-08-02 20:16:15
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?