Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

3604 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3604 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against NCLAT Order Affirming Admission of Section 9 Insolvency Application. The appeal concerns whether unpaid amounts under an EPC contract constitute operational debt under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and whether the application was barred by limitation or pre-existing dispute.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from the judgment and order dated 01.02.2021 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

15 Feb 2013

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaim in Share Brokerage Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that appellant failed to prove respondent's negligence in squaring off F&O contracts without notice.

24 Jul 2012

The appellant, Avalon Investment Private Limited, was a client of the respondent, Mukesh Brokerage & Financial Limited, a share broker registered with...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion of 467 Days Under Section 14 of Limitation Act for Filing Section 34 Application Under Arbitration Act. The court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply to applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the Union of India failed to demonstrate due diligence.

24 Apr 2017

The petitioner, M/s DDL Excavation Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, Union of India (UOI), entered into an agreement for execution of works in Goa. Dispu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit land.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Bajirao Ramchandra Shelar, filed two second appeals (Second Appeal No.494 of 1990 and Second Appeal No.495 of 1990) against the judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit — Limitation Period for Suit by Electricity Board Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Article 14. Suit for recovery of arrears of electricity charges filed within three years of demand notice held within limitation; interest rate reduced from 18% to 12% p.a.

23 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed by M/s. G.T. Iron & Steel Works (original defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 15th June 2002 passed by the Civil Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs. 200 to Rs. 150 per sq.meter. Comparable Sale Instances of Small Plots Require Deduction for Development When Applied to Large Acquisitions Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

2 Sep 2005

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in Land Reference No. 1 of 1987, which had enhanced the compensation for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution Proceedings and Possession Warrants in Suit for Specific Performance. Third-party purchasers cannot resist execution of decree for specific performance when they purchased property during pendency of suit without obtaining leave of court under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC.

22 Sep 2025

The present writ petition was filed by M/s. Prembrothers Infrastructure LLP and M/s. DJ Sons Hospitality (the petitioners) challenging the execution p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Limitation Dispute Between Contractor and Municipal Corporation. Court holds that cause of action for arbitration arose on rejection of claim by Commissioner on 6th January 2000, not on earlier dates, and thus reference was within limitation.

10 Mar 2023

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. R.N. Ghanekar & Co. (Appellant) and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Respondent) against a com...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery of Money Suit — Limitation Period for Refund of Advance Under Agreement to Sell Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, Not Article 24. Agreement to Sell Not a Bond, Hence Article 24 Inapplicable; Suit Filed Within Three Years from Date of Refusal to Execute Sale Deed Is Within Limitation.

29 Apr 2025

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for recovery of money seeking refund of an advance amount of Rs. 5,00,000 paid to the respondent-def...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)