Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

465 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons Issued Without Jurisdiction — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio. The court quashed summons under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 issued by an officer in Coimbatore to a Nagpur-based company, holding that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction.

6 May 2026

The petitioner, M/s D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited, a Nagpur-based company, challenged summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Office...

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR Against Husband and In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute Under Section 482 CrPC Due to Abuse of Process. Allegations of Harassment and Dowry Demands Under Sections 498A and 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Found Vague and Lacking Territorial Jurisdiction for Incidents Abroad.

8 Jan 2026

The case involved a criminal petition filed by four petitioners—the husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law—seeking to q...

High Court

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

1 Oct 2025

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Customs Appeal in Customs Broker Licensing Case — First Breach Considered Mitigating Factor. The court upheld the CESTAT order reducing penalty for Mahavir Logistics, a customs broker, on the ground that it was the first breach under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013.

7 Dec 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs (General) appealed against an order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, w...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cenvat Credit Dispute — Cargo Sales Report Held Valid Document for Availing Credit. CESTAT's finding that Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely because the document does not contain all particulars under Rule 9(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, upheld.

21 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai (West) under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Sequential Application of Valuation Rules Mandatory. Rule 7 and Rule 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 Cannot Be Applied Without First Considering Rules 4 and 5 for Identical or Similar Goods.

22 Apr 2019

The case involves appeals by M/s. Diyas Mantra Lighting Private Limited and its directors against orders of the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Pre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

23 Dec 2016

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Customs Duty Demand for Goods Imported at Different Port. Commissioner of Customs, Bombay lacks jurisdiction to demand duty for goods imported at New Delhi under an advance licence after change of port of registration.

14 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Vimal Nath, carrying on business as M/s Sharika Intl, was issued an advance licence on 16/2/1994 by licensing authorities at Delhi per...

Supreme Court

(SLP (C) No.28644 of 2019)

1 Jan 1970

Background: The case involves a service dispute where an Executive Engineer (Civil) with the North Delhi Municipal Corporation was dismissed from serv...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)