Search Results for "writ petition Article 227"

4185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation for Local Body Elections. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seek to Quash State Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Reservation.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a large batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.

A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Dispute. The Petitions Seek to Quash the Tribunal's Order on Grounds of Illegality.

This batch of writ petitions arose from proceedings before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT). The petitioners, numerous individuals, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010124482018_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging notifications issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...