Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

Writ Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Against the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal's Order Dated 2.3.2010 Dismissing the Applicants' Claims in Applications No.1212-1250/2010. The Petitioners Sought Quashing of the Tribunal's Order and Alleged Illegality in the Proceedings Before the Tribunal.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU

Admin

2026-08-02 16:15:20

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010587942010_1

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (09) 19

Writ Petition Nos.6842-6880/2010 (S-KAT) c/w Writ Petition Nos.15002/2011 & 21131-21146/2011, 16948-16995/2010, 8215/2010, 8715/2010 & 8906/2010, 10106/2010 & 12726-12763/2010, 17294-17327/2010, 17481/2010 & 17485-17490/2010 & 17723-17727/2010, 19401/2011 & 21520-21530/2011, 24525/2010, 41905-41908/2010 & 6747-6758/2011, 908-911/2011, 103593/2014 & 103620-103657/2014 (S-KAT)

2014-09-23

D.H. Waghela, Chief Justice, H.G. Ramesh, Justice

Sri H. Subramanya Jois, Sr. Counsel for Sri K.C. Shanthakumar (for petitioners); Sri Madhusudan R Naik, Sr. Advocate as Spl. Counsel along with Sri Ravindra D.K., Advocate for R1 & R2; Sri J Prashanth for M/s Ravivarma Kumar Associates for R3, R8-R10, R13, R15, R18, R20, R21, R23, R24, R25 & R27 – R31, 33-41; Sri S M Babu, Advocate for R4, R5, R14, R16, R17,R19 & R22; Sri C.M.Nagabhushan & Sri P.V.Chandrashekar, Advocates for R6, R7 & R26; Sri H Kantharaj, Advocate for C/R12; Sri V Lakshminarayan, Sr. Counsel for Sri L. Vijayakumar, Advocate for R42; Sri D N Nanjundareddy, Sr. Counsel for Nityanand, Advocates for R11 & R32

Mahesh A C, Suresh C, Shivananjegowda B N, Mahesh Jalwadi, H G Somashekar, K Rajesh, K Yogendra and others

State of Karnataka, Commissioner for Transport, B. P. Naveen, Hussain Sab, Malleshappa P Sajjan, Vinay Kumar, Santosh Kumar Kompi, Kavitha T N, Mohammed Sharief M Shekhaji, Raghavendrachari, Uday S Naik, Basavaraj Biradar, Gopal S, Shivappa Alagawadi, Murthy Naik K, Santosh M Patil, Dattatray Maski, Dundappa Shankar Naikodi, Ravishankar Nagathan, Parveez M G, Mahesh Kumar Menasinkai, Panchakshari Alavandi, Mahadevappa Talawar, Ningappa F Hosamani, Prakash Hulle, Ayyalappa, Jagadish H S, Raghavendra H V, Anantharamu, Amulya, Asha N R, Raju Bassappa Alagundi, Srinivas Murthy G N, Puttaswamy R, Subhash M S, Raghavendra A R, Ranganath, Basavaraju K C, Vidya N, P Pradeep Kumar, Prakash T M, Anand Reddy

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal's order dated 2.3.2010 in Applications No.1212-1250/2010 and a declaration that the proceedings culminating in that order were illegal and unsustainable

Filing Reason

The petitioners were aggrieved by the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal passed on 2.3.2010 in Applications No.1212-1250/2010

Previous Decisions

The Karnataka Administrative Tribunal passed an order on 2.3.2010 in Applications No.1212-1250/2010

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Applications No.1212-1250/2010 before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, which passed an order dated 2.3.2010. Aggrieved by that order, the petitioners filed the present writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka. The writ petitions were heard together.

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

High Court Writ Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Against the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal's Order Dated 2.3.2010 Dismissing the Applicants' Claims in Applications No.1212-1250/2010. The Petitioners Sought Quashing of ... 2026-08-02 16:15:20

High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Property Dispute — Interim Injunction Restored Pending Suit. The court held that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by reversing the trial court's grant of interim inj... 2026-08-02 16:15:15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Previous Decisions

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...