High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation for Local Body Elections. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seek to Quash State Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Reservation.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a large batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitions challenged notifications issued by the State Government, specifically the Department of Urban Development, regarding the reservation of wards in various urban local bodies. Notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 were impugned; they pertained to the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Women in the upcoming elections to municipal corporations, municipalities, and town panchayats across Karnataka. Petitioners, who were aspirants for candidature, contended that the reservation process was illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to constitutional provisions and statutory rules. The batch included matters from Mangaluru City Corporation, Madikere Municipality, Harapanahalli Town Municipal Council, Tiptur City Municipal Council, Bhadravathi City Municipal Council, and other local bodies. The State of Karnataka was represented by the Additional Advocate General, while the Karnataka State Election Commission and the respective municipal bodies appeared through their counsel. The court heard the arguments of all parties. The final judgment and orders are not contained in the provided text excerpt, which only includes the cause title and initial procedural details.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010000672019_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 71

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) C/W W.P. No.50796/2018 and other connected writ petitions

2019-01-14

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J., Sri K.N. Phaneendra, Smt. Vaishali Hegde, Sri Vishwajith Shetty, Sri Dinesh Rao, Smt. Prathima Honnapura, Sri S. Rajashekar, Sri Ashok Haranahalli, Sri Manmohan P.N.

Mr. Ravindra Nayak and others (in connected writ petitions)

State of Karnataka, Karnataka State Election Commission, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging reservation of wards for urban local body elections.

Remedy Sought

To quash notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 issued by the State Government regarding ward reservation and to direct reservation as per draft notifications or for general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claim that the reservation notified is illegal and contrary to constitutional provisions and statutory rules.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Scheduled Tribe Claim. Committee's findings based on father's school leaving certificate and community characteristics upheld as pure findings of fact without error of law.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation for Local Body Elections. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seek to Quash State Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Reservation.