Search Results for "upsarpanch"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "upsarpanch"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election in Gram Panchayat Dispute — No Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 for Failure to Pay Tax When No Tax Was Imposed.

1 Feb 2019

The case involves a dispute regarding the election of the Up-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Sukli, District Akola. The petitioners, who are members of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

1 Feb 2019

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order Setting Aside Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Living Children. The court held that under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958, the birth of a third child after the cutoff date attracts disqualification even if the child dies before the election.

21 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Dalpat Totaram Kshirsagar, challenged the order of the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, dated 15-5-2014, which set aside th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Result — Tick Mark on Ballot Paper Held Valid. Court upholds Additional Commissioner's finding that respondent no.4 received five votes, rejecting petitioner's claim of invalid vote under Section 33(5) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

14 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Meena Dilip Aware, and respondent no.4, Vaishali Kailas Kadu, were candidates for the post of Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Bhugaon. E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch — Holds That Election Must Be Held Within the Term of the Panchayat as Per Section 30 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court quashed the notice for election scheduled before the expiry of the existing Panchayat's term, ruling that such election would curtail the tenure of the existing body.

20 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Yogesh Pandharinath Dalvi and Sanjaykumar Dashrath Dubile, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the notice issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

14 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Minister's Order Setting Aside Disqualification of Director in Cooperative Bank. Disqualification under Section 73EA(ii) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is automatic and Registrar's order under Section 78(1) is ministerial; appellate authority must apply mind.

16 Aug 2012

The dispute in this writ petition relates to the disqualification of respondent No.4, Prafulla s/o Khushalrao Mankar, as a Director of the Yavatmal Di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch in Bombay Village Panchayat Act Case Due to Husband's Encroachment on Government Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

14 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Sau. Savitabai Sanjay Meshram, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Ashtgaon in 2007 on a seat reserved for Scheduled Caste woman....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Petitioners Failed to Show Any Infirmity in Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that acceptance of compensation without protest and delay in filing the petition barred the challenge.

1 Dec 2006

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land for the construct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Villages in Scheduled Areas Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. Court holds that the State Government's notification including villages in scheduled areas is valid and not subject to challenge in writ petitions.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats and individuals challenging the inclusion of their villages in scheduled areas unde...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)