Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch — Holds That Election Must Be Held Within the Term of the Panchayat as Per Section 30 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court quashed the notice for election scheduled before the expiry of the existing Panchayat's term, ruling that such election would curtail the tenure of the existing body.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Yogesh Pandharinath Dalvi and Sanjaykumar Dashrath Dubile, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the notice issued by the Collector for holding elections to the posts of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch of Jogeshwari Gram Panchayat on 21 August 2015. The petitioners contended that the existing Panchayat's term, which began on 6 September 2010, was yet to expire, and holding elections for the newly elected body would curtail their tenure. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch must be held within the term of the Panchayat as per Section 30 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court held that the election scheduled for 21 August 2015 was premature and would effectively cut short the existing Panchayat's term. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition, quashed the notice for the election, and directed that the election be held only after the expiry of the existing term.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch - Section 30 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - The court considered whether the election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch for the newly elected body can be held before the expiry of the term of the existing Panchayat. The court held that the election must be held within the term of the Panchayat and cannot be held before the expiry of the existing term, as it would curtail the tenure of the existing Panchayat. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch for the newly elected body of the Village Panchayat can be held before the expiry of the term of the existing Panchayat, and whether such election would curtail the tenure of the existing Panchayat.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the notice for election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch scheduled on 21.8.2015, and directed that the election be held only after the expiry of the existing term of the Panchayat.

Law Points

  • Election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch must be held within the term of the Panchayat
  • Section 30 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1959
  • Tenure of Panchayat cannot be curtailed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 18

Writ Petition No.8640 of 2015

2015-08-20

R.M. Borde, P.R. Bora

Mr. V.D. Sapkal for Petitioners; Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for Respondent State

Shri Yogesh Pandharinath Dalvi and Shri Sanjaykumar Dashrath Dubile

The State of Maharashtra, The Collector, Aurangabad, and The Presiding Officer for Election of Sarpanch and Upsarpanch to Jogeshwari Gram Panchayat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the notice for election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the notice for election scheduled on 21.8.2015 and direction to hold election only after expiry of existing term.

Filing Reason

The Collector issued a notice for holding elections to the posts of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch for the newly elected body of the Panchayat on 21.8.2015, which the petitioners contended would curtail the tenure of the existing Panchayat.

Issues

Whether the election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch for the newly elected body can be held before the expiry of the term of the existing Panchayat.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that holding the election on 21.8.2015 would curtail the tenure of the existing Panchayat, which began on 6.9.2010. Respondents did not file any counter, but the court considered the matter on merits.

Ratio Decidendi

The election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch must be held within the term of the Panchayat as per Section 30 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and cannot be held before the expiry of the existing term as it would curtail the tenure of the existing Panchayat.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are, thus, objecting to the holding of elections for the posts of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch for the tenure between the years 2015 and 2020 on 21.8.2015 on the ground that holding of such meeting, and election of the Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch from amongst the newly elected members, has an effect of curtailing the tenure of existing Panchayat.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date, heard on 20.8.2015, and disposed of at the admission stage with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959: Section 30
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch — Holds That Election Must Be Held Within the Term of the Panchayat as Per Section 30 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court quashed the no...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under MRTP Act — Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right Over Public Land. The court held that the Nagpur Municipal Corporation's demolition of unauthor...