Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Minister's Order Setting Aside Disqualification of Director in Cooperative Bank. Disqualification under Section 73EA(ii) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is automatic and Registrar's order under Section 78(1) is ministerial; appellate authority must apply mind.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 81
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute in this writ petition relates to the disqualification of respondent No.4, Prafulla s/o Khushalrao Mankar, as a Director of the Yavatmal District Central Cooperative Bank Limited (the Bank) under clause (ii) of Section 73EA of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (the Act). The ground for disqualification was that respondent No.4 was an office bearer of a defaulted Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society, namely Saoner Gramin Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Ralegaon. The Divisional Joint Registrar (respondent No.2), exercising power under Section 78(1) of the Act, passed an order on 12-5-2010 removing respondent No.4 as Director on the ground that he had incurred the disqualification. This order was set aside by the Hon'ble Minister of Cooperation, Maharashtra State, on 29-9-2010 in Appeal No.341 of 2010 under Section 152 of the Act. The petitioner, Sadashiv s/o Ganpatrao Mahajan, claiming to be a member of Adiwasi Seva Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., which is a member-society of the Bank, filed this petition challenging the Minister's order. The court first addressed the preliminary objection regarding the petitioner's locus standi, holding that as a member of a member-society, the petitioner has sufficient interest in the affairs of the Bank and thus has locus to file the petition. On merits, the court examined the nature of disqualification under Section 73EA(ii). It held that the disqualification is automatic and is incurred by a person upon becoming an office bearer of a defaulting society. The Registrar's order under Section 78(1) is merely a ministerial act to give effect to the disqualification, not a quasi-judicial determination. The court found that the Minister, as appellate authority, failed to consider the relevant material and did not apply his mind to the facts. The Minister's order was based on irrelevant considerations and was therefore unsustainable. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Minister's order dated 29-9-2010, and restored the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dated 12-5-2010.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Disqualification of Director - Section 73EA(ii) read with Section 78(1) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Automatic Disqualification - The disqualification under clause (ii) of Section 73EA is incurred automatically upon a person becoming an office bearer of a defaulting society. The Registrar's order under Section 78(1) removing such person is merely a ministerial act giving effect to the disqualification, not a quasi-judicial determination. (Paras 5-7)

B) Co-operative Law - Appellate Power - Section 152 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Non-Application of Mind - The Minister, as appellate authority, failed to consider the relevant material and did not apply his mind to the facts. The order setting aside the disqualification was based on irrelevant considerations and is unsustainable. (Paras 8-10)

C) Co-operative Law - Locus Standi - Member of Member-Society - The petitioner, being a member of a society which is a member of the Bank, has sufficient interest to challenge the order of the Minister, as the affairs of the Bank affect his rights. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Minister setting aside the disqualification of respondent No.4 as Director under Section 73EA(ii) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is valid and sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order dated 29-9-2010 passed by the Hon'ble Minister of Cooperation, Maharashtra State, Mumbai in Appeal No.341 of 2010 is quashed and set aside. The order dated 12-5-2010 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Amravati Division, Amravati is restored. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Disqualification under Section 73EA(ii) is automatic upon being office bearer of a defaulting society
  • Registrar's order under Section 78(1) is ministerial
  • appellate authority must consider relevant material and apply mind
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (08) 155

Writ Petition No.956 of 2011

2012-08-16

R.K. Deshpande, J.

Shri S. Paliwal for Petitioner, Smt. B.P. Maldhure for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, Shri P.C. Madkholkar for Respondent No.3, Shri A.M. Ghare for Respondent No.4

Sadashiv s/o Ganpatrao Mahajan

The Hon'ble Minister for Cooperation and Textile, State of Maharashtra, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Minister of Cooperation setting aside the disqualification of a director of a cooperative bank.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Minister's order dated 29-9-2010 and restoration of the Registrar's order dated 12-5-2010 removing respondent No.4 as director.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, a member of a member-society of the Bank, challenged the Minister's order which set aside the disqualification of respondent No.4 as director under Section 73EA(ii) of the Act.

Previous Decisions

The Divisional Joint Registrar passed an order on 12-5-2010 removing respondent No.4 as director. This order was set aside by the Minister on 29-9-2010 in appeal.

Issues

Whether the petitioner has locus standi to file the petition? Whether the order of the Minister setting aside the disqualification is valid and sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the disqualification under Section 73EA(ii) is automatic and the Registrar's order is ministerial; the Minister failed to apply his mind. Respondent No.4 argued that the petitioner has no locus standi and that the Minister's order was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

The disqualification under clause (ii) of Section 73EA of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is automatic and is incurred by a person upon becoming an office bearer of a defaulting society. The order of the Registrar under Section 78(1) removing such person is merely a ministerial act giving effect to the disqualification, not a quasi-judicial determination. The appellate authority under Section 152 must consider relevant material and apply its mind; failure to do so renders the appellate order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The disqualification under clause (ii) of Section 73EA is automatic and is incurred by a person upon becoming an office bearer of a defaulted society. The order of the Registrar under Section 78(1) is merely a ministerial act to give effect to the disqualification, not a quasi-judicial determination. The Minister, as appellate authority, failed to consider the relevant material and did not apply his mind to the facts.

Procedural History

The Divisional Joint Registrar passed an order on 12-5-2010 removing respondent No.4 as director under Section 78(1) of the Act. Respondent No.4 appealed to the Minister under Section 152, who set aside the order on 29-9-2010. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.956 of 2011 in the Bombay High Court challenging the Minister's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 73EA, Section 78(1), Section 152
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Sanction Under Section 151. Sanctioning Authority Must Apply Independent Mind and Not Merely Rely on Proposal of Assessing Officer.
Related Judgement
High Court "Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"