Search Results for "section 260A"

252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Marhatta Chamber of Commerce Held Eligible for Section 11 Exemption Despite Business Income. Trust's incidental business activity does not forfeit exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Reassessment Notice Based on Alleged Discrepancy in Accounts Found During Search Was Not Justified as Accounts Were Already Subject to Scrutiny Under Section 143(3).

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 4.7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Proper Inquiry. Commissioner's order under Section 263 set aside as no inquiry was conducted before passing the revision order.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Held Not Agricultural Despite Plantation. Sale of Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels at High Price Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Section 2(14) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, husband and wife, who sold their ancestral prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Not Agricultural Land. Land adjacent to five-star hotels with high sale price and lack of systematic cultivation fails to qualify as agricultural land under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, Minguel Chandra Pais and Maria Leila Tovar Furt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Non-Agricultural. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with High Sale Price and Lack of Systematic Cultivation Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had upheld the C...