Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Proper Inquiry. Commissioner's order under Section 263 set aside as no inquiry was conducted before passing the revision order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 63
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set aside the Commissioner's order under Section 263. The case pertains to Assessment Year 1998-99. The assessee, M/s Hindustan Lever Ltd., filed a return of income claiming deductions under Sections 80I, 80IA, and 80HH. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 143(3). Subsequently, the Commissioner issued a notice under Section 263 on 21 March 2003, stating that certain expenditures (R&D revenue and capital, interest paid, agency commission) had not been allocated to the units claiming deductions, resulting in underassessment of Rs.9.87 crores. The assessee replied on 25 March 2003, and the Commissioner passed an order on 28 March 2003, holding that the research expenditure was linked to the business and should have been allocated. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, holding that the jurisdiction under Section 263 was not properly invoked. The High Court admitted the appeal on question (a) only, as both counsel agreed it was determinative. The Court noted that the Commissioner issued the notice on 21 March 2003, the assessee replied on 25 March 2003, and the Commissioner passed the order on 28 March 2003, without making any inquiry. The Court held that the Commissioner must conduct a proper inquiry before invoking Section 263, and since no inquiry was conducted, the Tribunal's order was correct. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Revision under Section 263 - Jurisdiction - Proper Inquiry - The Commissioner must conduct a proper inquiry before invoking revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In this case, the Commissioner issued a notice and passed an order within a week without making any inquiry, and the Tribunal set aside the order. Held that the Commissioner's order was unsustainable as no inquiry was conducted (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was right in setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the jurisdiction under Section 263 has not been invoked properly.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the Tribunal is confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 263 jurisdiction requires proper inquiry
  • revision cannot be based on mere change of opinion
  • allocation of common expenditure for deduction under Sections 80I
  • 80IA
  • 80HH
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (02) 111

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5818 OF 2010

2012-02-01

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, M.S. Sanklecha

Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant, Mr. Percy J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Thakkar and Mr. Rajesh Poojari i/b. Mulla & Mulla for the Respondent

Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Mumbai

M/s. Hindustan Lever Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal setting aside the Commissioner's order under Section 263.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside the Tribunal's order and restore the Commissioner's order under Section 263.

Filing Reason

The Revenue was aggrieved by the Tribunal's order holding that the jurisdiction under Section 263 was not properly invoked.

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer completed assessment under Section 143(3). The Commissioner passed an order under Section 263 on 28 March 2003. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was right in setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Act, holding that the jurisdiction under Section 263 has not been invoked properly?

Submissions/Arguments

Both counsel agreed that the first question is broad enough to determine the fate of the appeal. The Revenue argued that the Commissioner had properly invoked Section 263. The assessee supported the Tribunal's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner must conduct a proper inquiry before invoking the revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In this case, the Commissioner issued a notice and passed an order within a week without making any inquiry, rendering the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Commissioner must conduct a proper inquiry before invoking the revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act. In the present case, the Commissioner issued a notice on 21 March 2003, the assessee replied on 25 March 2003 and the Commissioner passed the order on 28 March 2003. No inquiry was conducted.

Procedural History

Assessment under Section 143(3) completed. Commissioner issued notice under Section 263 on 21 March 2003, assessee replied on 25 March 2003, Commissioner passed order on 28 March 2003. Tribunal set aside Commissioner's order. Revenue appealed to High Court under Section 260A.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260A, 263, 143(3), 80I, 80IA, 80HH
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of complainant once issuance and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Proper Inquiry. Commissioner's order under Section 263 set aside as no inquiry was conducted before passing the revision order.