Search Results for "promotion date correction"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Enforceable, Issues Directions on Minimum Turnover Clauses. The Court ruled that the Procurement Order 2012 has force of law and that minimum turnover clauses must be proportionate, directing effective implementation of the 25% procurement mandate.

The petitioner, a Micro Enterprise and its founder, challenged the legality of minimum turnover clauses in government tenders that prevented their par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reversion of Family Court Employees in Service Law Case — Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules Are Void. Court Held That Appointments to Promoted Posts Must Be Made in Accordance with Statutory Rules and Not Merely on Administrative Orders.

The petitioners were employees of the Family Court, Mumbai, who had been promoted to higher posts such as Cashier, Shirestedar, and Assistant Shireste...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notice Against Employee. Recovery of Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Employer's Mistake Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Quashing of Recovery Notice. Employer Cannot Recover Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Its Own Mistake in Granting Exemption from Departmental Examination.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order in Police Service Matter — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Transfer Order Corrected Due to Clerical Error Does Not Require Fresh Hearing as It Is an Administrative Decision.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Bhagwanrao Kokil, a Senior Police Inspector, was initially transferred from M.R.A. Marg Police Station, Mumbai to Amravati Cit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Seniority Based on Earlier Appointment Date — D.Ed. Pay Scale Does Not Affect Seniority. Education Officer's Order Quashed for Ignoring Petitioner's Appointment on 03.07.1997.

The petitioner, Sanjay Dhananjay Pachpole, was appointed as an Assistant teacher on 03.07.1997 in Vikas Vidhyalaya, Satod, run by Gramin Shikshan Mand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Pension Refixation by Pune Municipal Corporation. Court holds that pension cannot be reduced without affording opportunity of hearing and that fixation of pay at time of promotion cannot be reopened after retirement.

The petitioner, Shri Shrikant Chintaman Joshi, was a retired employee of the Pune Municipal Corporation. He was appointed as an Overseer on 8th July 1...