Search Results for "fortuitous appointment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "fortuitous appointment"

72 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Classification Based on Educational Qualifications for Supernumerary Appointments in Municipal Service. Kolkata Municipal Corporation's Circular Creating Different Service Periods for Diploma and Degree Holder Sub-Assistant Engineers for Promotion to Assistant Engineer Posts Held Constitutional Under Articles 14 and 16.

21 Sep 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta dated 25 January 2019, which upheld a circular dated 3 July 2012 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against High Court Transfer: Government Notification Appointing District Judge Invalid for Lack of Consultation Under Article 233 of Constitution. Invalid Notification Did Not Bind High Court Which Had Power to Transfer Officer.

7 Oct 1969

The petitioner, an Additional District and Sessions Judge in Bihar, challenged the Patna High Court's order transferring him from Arrah to Singhbhum a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

30 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Addresses Reference on Withdrawal of ACPS Benefits for Non-Qualification in Departmental Test. Court Examines Whether Failing to Achieve Benchmark Marks in Promotion Examination Constitutes Ineligibility or Disqualification Justifying Withdrawal under 2001 and 2010 Government Resolutions.

12 Apr 2024

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was tasked with answering a reference framed by a Division Bench regarding the circumstances under which benef...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

8 Dec 2021

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

1 Jan 1970

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise Challenging CAT Order Quashing Reversion of Adhoc Promotee. Reversion of an employee promoted on adhoc basis upon revocation of suspension is illegal; employee entitled to reinstatement in promotional post.

13 Apr 2006

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Central Excise filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion and Seniority in MIDC — Petitioner Granted Deemed Date of Promotion with Consequential Benefits. Court Holds That Sealed Cover Procedure Cannot Be Applied When No Punishment Is Imposed and That Promotion Must Be Granted from the Date of Eligibility.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Prabhakar Jagguji Rangari, joined the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in 1978 as an Overseer and was promoted th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Restoring Seniority of Railway Employee. Seniority based on merit in selection test cannot be altered arbitrarily after three years.

21 Jun 2006

The Union of India, through the General Manager of Central Railway, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority List and Promotion Order in KIMS — Seniority Based on Date of Joining Upheld Over Merit Ranking. The court held that the petitioner, despite higher merit, cannot claim seniority over a colleague who joined earlier.

3 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Aadamali Nadaf, an Assistant Professor at Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Hubli, filed a writ petition under Artic...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)